Quantcast
Channel: Life & Death in the Sunshine State
Viewing all 246 articles
Browse latest View live

Know Your Colonial Gaol History #3: The Gaol on Petrie Terrace (part one)

$
0
0

Petrie Terrace Gaol (S. Woolcock, 1988).
Brisbane's Queen Street prison of the 1850swas constantly criticised as it was never really up to the job, so it was no surprise that the first public building to open after Queensland became a separate colony was a new prison. The new 'Public Gaol, Prison, and House of Correction' on Petrie Terrace (back then known as Green Hills) was proclaimed in September 1860 and was a source of considerable local pride. In those days a new, modern prison was something of a status symbol (the population of Ipswich had lobbied hard to have it built in their own town), and the building was one of several that marked Brisbane's rapid transition from frontier outpost to capital seat of a colony. However, while the prison was more modern and lasted longer than its predecessor, it soon struggled to meet the demands of a growing population (as has been the case with almost every Brisbane prison ever since).

Part one of this look at the Petrie Terrace Gaol will focus on the buildings themselves, the site of which later became the police barracks.
 
THE BUILDINGS
The prison was built of stone and brick and was initially surrounded by a tall wooden paling fence, which was soon replaced with a stronger stone wall. It cost about £26,000, much more than the measly £800 that had been allocated to prepare the Queen Street gaol just ten years beforehand. There were two main cellblocks, each one being threestories high and separated into two sections to make a total of four wings. Each wing contained 36 cells arranged back-to-back, and the cells opened onto external balconies with iron railings and external staircases. The separate cells were designed to keep the inmates apart at night and avoid the discipline and classification problems experienced at Queen Street. Each cell was 7’ 2” wide and 8’ 7” long, significantly smaller than the 10’ by 10’ recommended as being the smallest size admissible for the good health of prisoners back in England. The prisoners spent a lot of time in these cells, being allocated 13½ hours for sleeping in winter, and 13 hours during summer. 
 
Petrie Terrace Gaol ground plan, 1868













One cellblock was set aside for male prisoners, while the male ‘lunatics’ and the female prisoners took up one half each of the other cellblock. Female lunatics were housed with the general female population. After the transfer of all female inmates to Toowoomba in 1870, and the opening of the Woogaroo Asylum, the wings were all used for male prisoners. Each wing had its own yard, and later there was also a hospital, workshop buildings (tailoring, bootmaking, tinsmithing, netmaking and leatherwork) and a debtor’s ward on the site.

The original plan was to build a larger prison with five wings at a cost of some £100,000. This never happened and plans to extend the gaol in the late 1860s came to nothing as a new prison had been built over on Saint Helena Island.
UNDERGROUND CELLS?
There has been some confusion regarding the existence of underground solitary confinement cells at the prison.John Stanley James, a journalist known as the 'Vagabond', wrote a detailed account of a visit to these cells in 1877. He claimed that there were two 'dark cells', located in a sunken building in one of the yards and accessed by walking down a dozen steps. The cells measured 9 feet by 5 feet and were empty except for a can of water and boards on stretchers that served as beds. The floors were cemented, and the walls were made of thick stone with a small ventilation shaft at the top, making them very hot in summer. They were completely dark and prisoners serving more than one day in these cells were let out just once a day for an hour’s exercise.

HOWEVER, an archaeological dig at the site in 2006 found no evidence of these cells, and there is no reference to them in other records. Did they exist?  The best evidence suggests not, so perhaps James' report was the result of a 'vivid imagination'. I have written here before on the pervasiveness nature of stories about unseen underground tunnels and cells in local folklore.

Petrie Terrace Gaol, 1862 (John Oxley Library)
THE CONDEMNED CELLS
We do know that there were condemned cells at the prison, because 26 men were hanged there. These cells were in the end yard next to the male hospital, and opened onto the yard normally used for confines and juveniles to exercise in. It is possible that in later years some ground-floor cells in one of the wings were also used to hold prisoners under sentence of death. The condemned cells were much like the others, except that they had outer iron doors. When needed, the gallows were also erected in this yard, but their height allowed curious people outside to see over the wall and watch a hanging. It has been said that when hangings were due to take place, the local children were sent to play at the bottom of their gardens, safely out of view of the events taking place in the gaol yard.

Petrie Terrace gaol closed in 1883 when the new prison opened over at Boggo Road. 

The next article on the Petrie Terrace will look at the prisoners there and their conditions.

'The Prisoners of Toowong Cemetery: Life & death in the old Petrie Terrace gaol' is available from the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society's website.

Can we run Boggo Road? Yes We Can!

$
0
0


IMPORTANT UPDATE HERE

Can we run Boggo Road?

YES. WE. CAN.

Okay, some jolly nice person has been very kindly putting it about that the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society doesn’t have the 'commercial experience' to run Boggo Road for twelve months. For now, let’s ignore the fact that this splendid chap runs a small business that stagnated ten years ago and barely makes enough to support even one full-time job, and give him a little history lesson.

Boggo Road was open as a historical site until 2005. The BRGHS ran it under Public Works 2004-05. Back then we had ten members to start with, growing to 25. Here’s what happened during that time:

  • The gaol was open every day it was supposed to be.
  • We ran several hundred tours and never missed a single one. That’s tens of thousands of visitors.
  • We had an average of six volunteer staff turn up on opening days. More than was actually needed.
  • We researched, designed, constructed and installed dozens of displays and exhibits both inside and outside the gaol.
  • We did the cleaning and minor maintenance tasks
  • We re-registered, cleaned and stored thousands of museum artefacts.
  • We established the ‘Inside History’ publishing project which has since released nearly 40 titles 
  • We established a library of historical records 
  • We established productive working relationships with other community organisations, and we worked very well with government

All that with just a handful of people. Now fast forward seven years. Even though the gaol has been closed all that time, we have grown to over 270 members – over TEN TIMES the size we were. 

So can we run it again?  
Yes we can
Can we have something different happening every weekend to keep the crowds coming? 
Yes we can.
Can we get more staff than we know what to do with?
Yes we can.
Can we get visitors through the door?
Yes we can.
Can we create a dynamic cultural and community hub that is a credit to the Boggo Road Urban Village?
Yes we can
Can we give a voice to the former officers and inmates who know the place like nobody else does?
Yes we can
Can we run tours for schools, Seniors, other adults and the ghost crowd?
Yes we can.
Can we create jobs?
Yes we can
Can we make brilliant groups like the Queensland Shakespeare Ensemble part of the Boggo Road family?
Yes we can
Can we make it affordable for all?
Yes we can.
Can we allow private businesses access?
Yes we can 

All too easy.
We can do all that, and more. We've done it before.
And now (given the chance) we can do it bigger than before, and we can do it better than before.

Boggo Road Reopens (well, kind of)

$
0
0

So, the Department of Public Works have decided to openpart part of the Boggo Road Gaol for a four-month 'trial period'. The long term plans are still being put together so the finished product is still a long way off yet, but in the meantime the first two floors of one of the cellblocks (and some of the yards) will be open to tour groups. The shaded area in the diagram to the right hereshows which buildings are open for access.  

Some might argue that the "Do it once, do it right" approach would have been wiser, even if it means waiting a few months longer, but here we are. I've written too many article on this whole reopening saga to link to here, but needless to say it is nowhere near over. When they do get round to refurbishing the site, it could be closed for another year, so everything that is happening now is no more than a stop gap. 

Anyway, the gaol is now available for all manner of organisations to go and do their historical/educational/cultural stuff there, so the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society will be looking to make the best of the current situation and run our tours, just like we used to do up to 2005. We would be compensating for the limited available space by keeping our prices reasonable and giving you the chance to listen to and chat with people who were actually there when the prison was a prison.  

After waiting seven years while the gaol was closed, the state government gave us three days notice of this (yeah, seriously) so we are still finalising our tour details. This is what we want to do:

DAY TOURS

NIGHT TOURS

HAUNTED CELLBLOCK TOURS 

Tours would run for up to 2 hours each. 

I've been through the reasons before why I think our tours are the best Boggo Road tours that we know of, and here they are again.

We in the BRGHS have always advocated that the public should have a great choice in how they see the gaol, and now we might see organisations like the National Trust of Queensland, the Queensland Shakespeare Ensemble and the Queensland Penal and Prison Asssociation running events in the gaol. The choice is yours...

Confused about the Boggo Road reopening?

$
0
0
Judging by the phone calls and emails I've received, there is a lot of confusion about this Boggo Road opening, so here are some basic facts to hopefully set people straight:

IS THIS A FULL REOPENING?
No. Part of the gaol is only open for a four-month trial period. Even if this works out, it will only stay open for a further interim period of several months. This is because the Boggo Road Urban Village developers (Leighton Properties) are still finalising the long-term plans for the gaol and surrounding space. While much of the gaol will still be used for historical/cultural/educational purposes, parts of it will be adapted for mixed use (I don't know what, so please don't ask me). 

What this means is that when the final plans are in place and approved, the interim opening will end and the gaol will close again for refurbishment. And then reopen again. Probably.

IS ALL THE GAOL OPEN?
Blue area = open building
No. To be honest, it will actually be very limited, so there will be access to some of the exercise yards and the first two floors of ONE of the cellblocks. The top floor will be closed off for safety purposes.This is something I want to be very clear and honest about so people can't complain to me and demand a refund if they expected to see more.

WILL THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY BE RUNNING THEIR TOURS AGAIN?
That is the plan. We want to do night, day and 'Haunted Cellblock' tours. It is the duty of the interim license holder to provide 'fair and equitable access' for any other organisation wanting to run appropriate events in the gaol, but they have not provided this yet. When we do get access sorted we aim to run the brilliant tours mentioned here and here (also see here for more details). 

So there you have it. This is a interim-trial reopening of part of the gaol and you will have to wait a wee bit longer for the BRGHS tours. Like the finest Scotch, they're worth waiting for.

Why this temporary Boggo Road reopening is unacceptable to the BRGHS - and why it should be unacceptable to you too

$
0
0

(The following is based on a recent statement by the BRGHS

Members of the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society believe that the recent decision by Public Works to reopen part of the Boggo Road Gaol to tour groups on an interim basis is so badly flawed that theyhave little choice but to boycott the interim reopening and focus instead on the long-term future of the gaol.

I want to explain that decision to the public here, because it was a difficult one and perhaps unexpected and people need to understand why we made it.  

The big picture is that long-term planning for the redevelopment of the siteby Leighton Properties is still underway. Those plans are not expected to be finalised and approved until later next year, and then the old gaol will be closed again and refurbished for reuse before opening on a permanent basis. In the meantime, part of one of the cellblocks has recently been opened on an interim basis for a four-month period, and a small business has given interim commercial control of the site under a Deed of License. It is that last part the BRGHS members have trouble with.

The blue part is the only building open right now.
The BRGHS feels that any participation on their behalf would be seen to condone and help normalise the current situation, so they wanted to send a clear messagethatthe members feel that what has happened is completely unacceptable.

In my own opinion, the gaol should not have been opened at all at this time. My attitude is‘do it once, do it right’ and to only open it when the site is good and ready and it could be done properly and permanently under a decent management model.

What we got instead was a bungled rush job. I'm not going to put down public servants who have found themselves in a difficult position not of their own making, but that's what it was. When the Public Works minister Tim Mander announced the reopening last week he said that not-for-profit groups like ours had ‘fair and equitable’ access to Boggo Road, but no access arrangements had even been put in place. If everybody had just waited a few weeks until after the New Year, these things could have been worked out, if not with us then with other stakeholders.

The BRGHS were later told in writing that all 'third parties' would have to pay an access fee set by the private business for the privilege of taking a tour group through this publicly-owned building. Figures were mentioned that would have swallowed up to 100% of any tour revenue. That is the info the BRGHS had in writing when making their decision.  

The crazy part is that this business owner, Cameron ‘Jack’ Sim, has been VERY hostile to BRGHS volunteer activities over a number of years and has made it quite clear to the BRGHS that he would not allow any other activities at the gaol to adversely affect his business interestsHe also believes he has some trademark rights over Boggo Road and has sent the BRGHS legal threats on the matter. Now the volunteers are expected to work hard for his financial benefit? Even participating in this temporary arrangement would have been a stamp of approval that the members of the BRGHS were not prepared to give. The BRGHS has been telling Public Works for years that they could not enter into any commercial relationship with Mr Sim but it seems that nobody was listening. 

And so here we are.We are not squabbling kids and do not appreciate being treated as such. I challenge any public servant (my wife is one) or normal business person to put up with what some of our members have gone through and pretend nothing happened.   

The BRGHS also has concerns with the way in which this decision was reached. Boggo Road is a large public asset that belongs to the people of Queensland, and there should have been a tender process. It might only open for a few months, and it’s only part of one cellblock, but the principle of the thing matters. How does this bode for other historical sites and volunteer groups across Queensland? 

The BRGHS only found about any planned reopening by chance back in September when someone saw it mentioned on Facebook. It was later found out that not only had Premier Campbell Newman told Mr Sim back in June that he would open the gaol this year, but a few days later Mr Sim was telling people that he had already ‘got the gaol’. This whole decision is a 90 degree turn from where Public Works have been heading for the last few years and, to me, seems to have come from the top down. The BRGHS has worked really well with Public Works for years, but Campbell Newman did not even reply to their letters to him on this matter, including one that had been hand-signed by about 80 former officers with a combined total of over 1,300 years of service to the state behind them!
1,376 years of service, then you get ignored.
The BRGHS were never independently consulted on this matter without the business owner being present, and even the National Trust of Queensland, who are very interested in running the site, were completely excluded from discussions.

Straight away I got the impression that the aim was to try and shoehorn our group in there on a token basis while the private business ran things. There was a significant difference in approaches, as the BRGHS have always believed that the gaol needs to be run under a not-for-profit model that maximises public and educational use of Boggo Road through a diverse range of affordable on-site activities.

During the discussions, senior political staffers warned that if an agreement was not reached with Mr Sim then the state government would initiate an Expressions of Interest process. When the BRGHS decided that an EOI would be a good thing, the government ran a mile in the other direction. As I said before,  Boggo Road belongs to the people of Queensland and there should have been some kind of transparent tender process, or at least a rigorous examination of the proposals, before making this decision.  

On the bright side, this flawed arrangement is only for a short time and the big long-term decisions are yet to be made. I just hope that when that time comes, the state government goes through a more rigorous, transparent and inclusive decision-making process.

In the meantime, the BRGHS will continue to work on their plans for the long-term future of the gaol, and they strongly encourage people to wait until the site is opened properly and permanently before visiting it.

Gold Coins & Straw Men: Who really runs Australia's heritage prisons?

$
0
0

So I'm watching TV the other night and there's a small businessman on the news telling me that Boggo Road 'can’t be run on volunteerism and gold coin donations' (watch it here). And you know what? I agree completely (ignoring the anti-volunteer sentiments).

To put this in context, this was Cameron 'Jack' Sim arguing why (his) small business should be allowed to run the heritage gaol. I have to agree that Boggo Road cannot be run with gold coin donations, but there againit's a moot point because nobody has ever suggested the gaol should be funded by gold coin donations. Certainly not the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society. Indeed, their recently suggested tour price schedule was as follows:

  • Historical day tours - $12/$10
  • Historical night tours - $15/$13
  • Haunted Cellblock tours - $25/$20
  • School groups - $5 per head
Above: The BRGHS welcomes you to Boggo Road
Nary a gold coin donation in sight. I don’t know where this ‘gold coin donation’ furphy comes from... no, actually, I do; it is a disingenuous straw man argument that deliberately misrepresents the position of the BRGHS in order to bolster the assertion that that Boggo Road needs to be commercially run in order to succeed (as opposed to an imaginary 'gold-coin volunteer' model presumably):
“One of the greatest tourist attractions in Australia... is Port Arthur... and I don't think anyone in Australia doesn't know Port Arthur, and it's run as a commercial operation, and so is Fremantle Gaol too, two of the world's great tourism attractions when it comes to the story of prison history.”
('Jack' Sim, Radio 4GB, 19 December 2012)
Once again, I have to agree. Boggo Road absolutely does need to be run as a commercial operation, and Port Arthur and Fremantle Prison are indeed ‘two of the world's great tourism attractions’. And yes they are commercial operations... 100% managed bynot-for-profit organisations. Port Arthur Historic Site (owned by the Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment) is run by the ‘Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority’ (PAHSMA), which is a not-for-profitGovernment Business Enterprisethat employs 150 people. Fremantle Prison is in the WA Housing and Public Works portfolio and managed by the WA Department of Finance. Not a private business in sight. 
Fremantle Prison
These world-class venues are brilliant examples of why Boggo Road should also be run by a not-for-profit body that can create a top-shelf tourism experience, get visitors through the gates, employ people in real jobs, and return the money to the gaol itself. This is what the BRGHS has always wanted.And let's face it, from what I've seen so far none of those things are happening at Boggo Road right now. 

For the record, the BRGHS has never proposed that it should manage the redeveloped Boggo Road site itself. Never. Members of the BRGHS actually want it to be a National Trust of Queensland site, and the National Trust is a large professional organisation that can run things very professionally indeed. Much more professionally than ourselves or a small business ever could. Old Melbourne Gaol, one of the country’s top tourist attractions, is a prime example of how the National Trust can run an old heritage gaol with resounding success, winning a string of the most important national and state heritage tourism awards (in 2010 it won the Australian Tourism award for best heritage and cultural tourism site in the whole country).
Old Melbourne Gaol, one of the very best heritage tourism sites in
Australia, is run by the National Trust of Victoria.
Port Arthur, Melbourne and Fremantle are the Big Three of Australia heritage gaols, but there is actually an extensive network of other heritage prison and lock-up sites right around the country, a result of the necessarily solid construction of these buildings. How are these places run? In almost every single case they are publicly-owned and operated along not-for-profit lines. There are some differences on the ground in how they operate, with some sites offering a mix of not-for-profit and private business services, but the state or local governments that own them play a massive role in funding and management. 

Maitland Gaol is owned and managed by the Maitland City Council, which employs a number of staff at the site. Old Dubbo Gaol is owned by Dubbo City Council and managed by their Community Services Division. The Adelaide Gaol Museum is owned by the Department of Environment & Heritage and the not-for-profit Adelaide Gaol Preservation Society runs the tours there. Queensland’s Saint Helena Island is controlled by the Departmentof Environment and Resource Management and is home to a range of tourism operations.
Old Dubbo Gaol
So this “Boggo Road must be run as a commercial operation” argument is another furphy if it is used to make the case for a private business running the gaol. ‘Commercial operations’ are not the exclusive domain of private business, and not-for-profit organisations obviously can - and do - run large tourism sites along commercial lines. Even (as Mr Sim himself has helpfully pointed out) some of the “world's great tourism attractions” like Port Arthur and Fremantle Prison. Not to forget Old Melbourne Gaol of course. If the National Trust of Queensland was to run Boggo Road, it would be a commercial operation just like their hugely successful Currumbin Wildlife Sanctuary.

All the heritage gaol sites listed below are also operated along not-for-profit lines (or at least they were the last time I checked):

NSW
Cooma Gaol Museum (NSW Department Corrective Services)
Hay Gaol Museum (Hay Shire Council)
Narrabri Old Gaol Heritage Centre (Narrabri & District Historical Society)
Silverton Gaol Museum (Broken Hill Historical Society)
Trial Bay Gaol (NSW National Parks and Wildlife/Friends of Trial Bay)
Old Wentworth Gaol (Wentworth Shire Council)
QLD
Normanton Gaol (Normanton Council)
Old Croydon Gaol (Croydon Shire Council)
St. Helena Island (QLD National Parks & Wildlife)
NT
Fannie Bay Gaol Museum (National Trust NT)
Old Stuart Town Gaol (National Trust NT)
SA
Redruth Gaol (National Trust SA)
TAS
Ross Female Factory (TAS Parks & Wildlife)
TAS
Barracks and Convict Gaol, George Town [also known as Old Watch House Museum] (George Town & District Historical Society)
Cascades Female Factory Historic Site (Female Factory Historic Site Ltd Board [not-profit])
Hadspen Gaol (Westbury Historical Society)
Old Hobart Gaol [also known as Penitentiary Chapel Historical Site] (TAS National Trust)
Richmond Gaol (TAS Parks & Wildlife)
VIC
Ararat County Gaol [also known as J-Ward Historic Gaol] (Friends of J-Ward)
Geelong Heritage Gaol (Rotary Club)
WA
Albany Convict Gaol (Albany Historical Society Inc.)
Derby Police Gaol (Commissioner of Police)
Guildford Old Town Gaol (Swan Guildford Historical Society)
Old Courthouse and Gaol, Perth(Western Australia Museum)
Old Cue Gaol (Shire of Cue)
Old Toodyay (or Newcastle) Gaol Museum (Toodyay Shire Council)
Roebourne Old Gaol Museum (Shire of Roebourne)


The only old gaols where private business predominates are special-case examples that could not apply to Boggo Road. Mount Gambier Gaol in South Australia provides backpacker accommodation. In the same State, the Gladstone Gaol used to be a privately-run accommodation centre, but I’m not sure who runs this place now. Several private businesses ran the Old Castlemaine Gaol in Victoria but they all failed, and the site was recently sold off for peanuts by the idiots in the local council in very controversial circumstances. 

So the message is clear:The not-for-profit sector kicks serious ass when it comes to running world-class tourism operations in Australian heritage gaols, and such a model would work just as well at Boggo Road. And I'm so glad that a small businessman like Mr Sim wholeheartedly agrees with the BRGHS on this. You know it makes sense. 

THE TOP 5 'BOGGO BLOG' ARTICLES OF 2012

$
0
0


When the Boggo Blog started back in 2010 I was rather excited when, after a few months of writing, the blog recorded over 300 monthly page views for the first time. Fast-forward to now, and the page-view stats over the last couple of months have been comfortably over fivefigures. It's a whole other level.

Each month has been better than the last through this year, and I've got a job on my hands maintaining this trajectory for 2013. However, judging by what people seem to be reading, the secret seems to be a case of writing about the bizarre, the unknown and the gruesome, with a good deal of mythbusting thrown in. 

Here are the five most popular articles written over the last twelve months. These are not necessarily the most read this year, as some pre-2012 articles continue to attract a lot of attention, and this Top 5 list is based on the highest monthly averages rather than total number of reads in 2012.
 
Written in the wake of a federal senator's controversial comments about same-sex marriage rights possibly leading to calls for bestiality rights, this article looked at the history of bestiality laws in Queensland and some of the unfortunate individuals imprisoned for the crime. As interested as Boggo Blog readers seem to be in bestiality, I really don't see myself revisiting this subject any time soon.

This was back in February, when tours around the OUTSIDE of the Boggo Road walls were being run on Sunday market days and advertised in a way that gave the deliberate impression that visitors might get INSIDE the prison. Despite some pathetic bellyaching about this article from those responsible for the tours, we certainly had enough disappointed would-be visitors turn up to our market stall, with massive cameras around their necks, to warrant me writing it. Ironically, last week I met somebody who went on these tours and won't be going back now that the gaol is actually open inside because they felt that they had 'already done a tour there anyway'.     
 
I don't think there is a town in the world without some local folklore about hidden tunnels beneath the streets there. Brisbane is no exception, and this article busted a few myths (and confirmed other rumours) about underground cells, tunnels to old prisons, or massive World War 2 equipment dumps. Having done a bit of exploring and research in this department over the years, it was good to pull some info out of forgotten folders and get it online.

Another myth-buster, this was designed to nip some new false assertions in the bud. These assertions were that (a) the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society wanted to run the old gaol on 'gold coin donations' (not true), and (b) the implication that the successful old prisons at Port Arthur and Fremantle are run by private businesses (again, not true). I'm always open to frank discussions about the future of Boggo Road, but sadly there's a been a bit too much of nonsense like this floating around this year. Some of it has been exposed on the Boggo Blog, but there is still more to come.

And the winner is... by a considerable margin, a little history of sharks killing dogs in the Brisbane River. I can only hope that some of the thousands of people who read this one had a family pet that no longer takes summer dips in the river, because the history in this story is long and bloody.

I must admit to being a little disappointed that my articles about tigers and bulls didn't quite make the Top 5, but here's some of those great pictures anyway: 




Thanks to all the Boggo Blog readers for the best year yet. Sometimes it was a walk on the dark side, and sometimes we kicked heads, but it was always interesting for me (at least). I'd also like to give a special thanks to Liam Baker over at The Haunts of Brisbane for joining me in the trenches this year. Liam and I don't see eye-to-eye when it comes to things like the paranormal, but he shares my commitment to bringing you the TRUTHabout our favourite aspects of Brisbane and Queensland history.

I'm looking forward to another record-breaking year in 2013.Happy New Year!

Censorship on this Blog

$
0
0
A quick bit of housekeeping.

I had to reluctantly remove some comments posted to this blog this week. They were actually really good and some of the best I've ever seen here, but the problem was that in one sentence some serious accusations were made and the perpetrator was named.

Now, I've heard similar stories before. I know that a lot of nasty and horrific things happened at Boggo Road. I've spoken to enough people who were there to know that. However, this blog is in the public sphere and is not the place for making any specific accusations because I can be held legally responsible for material posted by others on this blog and be potentially liable for defamation.

If people want to share stories here that is fine, but as most commenters are either anonymous or unknown to me then I cannot allow open slather for people to accuse and NAME other people of committing crimes or heinous acts. To do so would be just asking for trouble. 

I know that feelings can run very high as far as Boggo Road goes, but this is my blog and my rules. And the #1 rule is that I cannot publish any comment that a specific named person could take legal action on.
 
So if a commenter posts that they know that people were raped in the the prison, that's fine. But if they want to start naming names in the public sphere that's something else. I'm all for those stories being told - but not here. 

I know I sometimes throw my own accusations around on this blog, but they are my responsibility and I make damned sure everything I say can be backed up with hard evidence. I am not prepared to take responsibility for accusations made by people I don't know about things I don't know of. If other people want to make serious accusations, please go ahead but do it in a way in which you take full personal responsibility for your words. Start your own blog even, or write a book.
 
This is not to protect one person or another, or to take sides. This is in the name of having a fair and consistent comments policy and making damned sure I don't get sued. I do have a wife and four kids here and we don't want to lose our house. I also have my own life to lead and my own work to do and have enough on my plate without any complications coming from a simple blog like this. 

Yes, it is censorship, but there you go. It's my blog, my rules.

The Greatest Last Meal of All Time!

$
0
0


I recently thumbed through an interesting book called Texas Death Row, a compilation of information about the people executed in Texas in the modern era. Each prisoner’s last meal request was listed, and what stood out for me was how the vast majority of them wanted hamburgers or fried chicken, with fries, ice cream, cola, milk shakes, etc. It was a clear reflection of the culinary tastes of the Texan criminal class.

Unfortunately there is not too much in the records to show what the residents of the Boggo Road condemned cells had to eat, but every once in a while one of the newspapers would mention it in passing. 

Under the Murder Act of 1872, condemned murderers were allowed only bread and water in the usual 48-hour timespan between sentencing and execution. Catholics were also allowed wine of the Sacrament. This changed in later years, and condemned prisoners were given special privileges, including ordering whatever food they wished (within reason). For example, Chinese man Wong Tong, who was hanged at Boggo Road in 1886, was fond of plates of boiled rice and milk, tinned fish, and boiled meat. He also drank tea and the occasional glass of brandy. His compatriot Tim Tee, hanged in 1886, was quite particular about his last meal, requesting two boiled eggs on the condition that they were not boiled for more than two-and-a-half minutes.

Others were less fussy. Ernest Austin, who gained considerable weight during his time in Boggo Road by eating a 450g block cake every day, settled for a last meal of bacon, eggs, and a bowl of hominy (the rough prison porridge made from cracked wheat and water).

By far the most extravagant request was made by George Gleeson, who was hanged for murder in 1892. He had an Indian mother and a white American father, andwas a cook by trade. He used the full extent of his culinary imagination to dream up this fantastical meal on the Thursday before his execution:

George Gleeson, 1892
(Queensland State Archives)
  • 2 lbs of rump steak, to be cooked as a bread steak, with walnuts and poached eggs.
  • 1½lbs green peas, 1lb carrots, 1lb turnips, 1lb beans and a cauliflower.
  • A suckling pig, stuffed with pork sausages, bread crumbs, onions, pepper, salt, thyme, sage, parsley, butter and the yolks of two eggs. The sauce for this was to be made of brains of calf or sheep, a little flour, pepper, salt, parsley and butter. 
  • Cucumber and boiled egg salad.
  • A boiled cabinet pudding, made with 12 eggs, 1lb sultanas, 1lb raisins, 1lb currants, candied lemon peel and lemon essence. To be served with custard.
  • Plum pudding, made with 1lb suet, 6 eggs, a bottle of rum, 2lbs flour, loaf of bread, small packet of baking powder.
  • A selection of bananas, oranges, pineapples and American apples.
  • 1½lb pound cake
  • 6 bottles of lemonade
  • 6lbs white loaf sugar
  • 3 packets of cigarettes
  • 2 dozen quill cigars

Such a request was of course beyond the means of the humble kitchen and staff, not to mention the prison budget. It is probably also beyond human ability to actually eat this much food anyway, and even Monty Python's Mr Creosote would struggle with it. There again, maybe George planned to eat himself to death.

The 94 people hanged in Queensland: Where were they from?

$
0
0

  • The first hanging in Brisbane took place in 1830. The last one in Queensland was in 1913. 
  • 93 of these people were men, one was a woman (from Ireland)

The #1 Reason to Boycott Boggo Road

$
0
0

Last year Public Works spent tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars preparing Boggo Road for public access. It is, after all, a public asset. Then they handed commercial control of part of the place (for a 'trial period') to the owner of a small business (Ghost Tours) who assured them that he could make $2 million per year there, returning six figure sums to the government to help maintain and preserve it.

Then, after Boggo Road opened, we were told that the arrangement was that revenue would be paid back to the government on a monthly basis, in the form of a lease. The businessman himself publicly announced that this 'wasn't free' and he was paying all kinds of money to be allowed to operate at the gaol.

We found out today exactly how much he is paying: $0.

Nothing
Zero
Zilch

Yes, you read that right. A private business was handed a public asset, your public asset, without any tender process, fixed up at public expense, and is paying exactly $0 for the privilege. No rent. No lease. No fees. On the other hand, he is running stupidly expensive tours (up to $40) and hiring the site out for functions at $2250 a pop, almost all of which is going straight into his own pocket. The gaol gets nothing. The taxpayer gets nothing back for their investment. If any of this makes sense to you, I suggest you return to the top of the page and start reading again.

When the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society put their plans for the gaol to government last year the emphasis was all on what they could give back to Boggo Road, to help cover costs for maintenance and preservation. They proposed returning over 90% of the revenue raised straight back to the gaol. The BRGHS wanted to give, give, give. Ghost Tours want to take, take, take.

The attitude seems to be "Ask not what you can do for Boggo Road, but what Boggo Road can do for you".

Now we already knew that the place was being mismanaged. Other organisations have NOT been granted 'fair and equitable access' (despite what the propaganda might say - but more on that next week); Visitor numbers are dwindling; Bugger all real jobs have been created; But now it seems that the worst of it is that the gaol isn't even getting any money anyway. In these circumstances, it's only fair to say:

BOYCOTT BOGGO ROAD!

The place BELONGS to the public, it should be run for public good, not personal profit. If you go there, your money is going straight into one man's pocket. Not to the gaol.  

Save your money. Wait until the place is opened properly, and then your money will do some good for Queensland heritage instead of paying for someone's luxury car.

It shouldn't be like this. We can do much, much better. Join our fight and visit the Better Future for Boggo Road facebook page and blog.

Postscript:I have a business proposal. Every time someone wants to use the BBQ's at Roma Street Parkland, the government makes them pay me $25 for the privilege. Now, I know taxpayers paid for the parklands to be built and maintained and all that, and they own them, but I won't actually give any money back to the government or anything. They can pay to look after their own stupid parklands, and I'll have a cash bonanza making people pay through the nose for using stuff they already own.   

After all, if it's good enough for Boggo Road, it's good enough for anywhere else. Maybe you too could profit and earn from your very own public asset!

Chin up! The thoroughly decent way to break a chap's neck

$
0
0


The 'subaural knot' (1880) 
It’s been a long while since I put a morbid post about the death penalty, so here's the first for 2013.

Back in the late 19th century there was serious debate within the British and Australian medical professions about how to improve the hanging technique to ensure a quick ‘clean’ death. The problem was that the authorities wanted a quick death for the prisoner after the drop from the gallows, with the neck being cleanly broken, but too many hangings ended with the prisoner being either strangled to death or dying quickly but suffering bloody wounds to the neck, or even total decapitation as happened in Brisbane in 1880.

The debate centred on the length of the drop and the type of knot used. Colonel John de Zouche Marshall, a doctor who had witnessed several hangings in English prisons, was convinced that placement of the knot was the most important element of the hanging method, and that the best way to ensure a broken neck and a quick death was to use the submental knot, placed underneath the chin. The one problem with this kind of knot was the danger of it slipping up and over the face after the drop, so to prevent this from happening Marshall designed what he called a ‘chin trough’. The execution rope would be fed through the trough, and when the prisoner reached the end of the drop and the rope stretched, the chin trough would snap back and, in turn, snap the neck. 
The 'chin trough' (British Medical Journal, 6 October 1888)
De Zouche Marshallpresented his design and supporting evidence to the British Capital Sentences Committee in 1886. Although he had reason to believe that the committee supported his arguments, Marshall was most disappointed when their final report produced a table of drop measurements to be used in conjunction with a subaural knot, placed underneath the jaw near the ear. He subsequently wrote a somewhat tetchy article for the British Medical Journal outlining the evidence in favour of using the submental, while claiming that there was ‘none against it’.

The committee preferred the long drop so abhorred by Marshall because they felt it better to risk relatively painless decapitation than slow strangulation. Marshall felt that his recommendations were sacrificed ‘on the altar of departmental red tape’ because he did not belong to the ‘select brotherhood of prison surgeons’. He wrote that the long drop method as preferred by the committee was ‘sure to bring about ghastly scenes at executions, calculated more than anything else to foster the sentimental agitation for the abolition of capital punishment’, perhaps implying that this was the underlying intention of the committee chairman, Lord Aderbare, who was known to be an abolitionist.

Doctor James Barr, a member of the Capital Sentences Committee, responded to Marshall’s article by claiming the chin trough was technically faulty and would not reliably work in the manner which Marshall described. He also wrote that for the sake of the prisoner it was more humane to get the hanging over as quickly possible, and attaching the chin trough under the gallows would be time-consuming. While Barr was generally supportive of the use of the submental knot, he believed that the knot type was of secondary importance to the ‘energy of the fall’. This subject proved to be of lasting importance to Marshall, who wrote to the British Medical Journal in 1913 complaining that the official scale of drops had been ‘absolutely ignored’ since its introduction in 1888, and again argued the effectiveness of the submental knot.

Another advocate of the submental knot was Professor Frederic Wood-Jones, who carried out a series of tests with Marshall in 1913 by using different knots to hang cadavers knots in order to see what kind of fracture, if any, was produced. The submental versus subaural argument continued into the 1930s, but it was the subaural that remained the standard knot used in British and Australian executions.

The Case of Jack the Rip-off

$
0
0


We all know that under his interim license Jack 'Cameron' Sim of Ghost Tours is not paying anything back to Boggo Road Gaol while he profits from it with expensive tours. Well, it turns out that 'Jack the Rip-off' has made Boggo Road the most expensive cultural heritage place you can visit in (mainland*) South East Queensland. Here are the shocking numbers (price per adult):


In the coming months you might hear some debate in the media about private vs not-for-profit management of these kind of places, but the message here is crystal clear. The only privately-run place in this list is Boggo Road, and just look at the results.  Even though many of those other places have absolutely MASSIVE overheads, and plenty of staff, just look how much more affordable they are to visit. And bear in mind that:

  • Sim was gifted free use of Boggo Road Gaol by the state government and so has minimum overheads, and so most of the money you pay to get into this publicly-owned building goes straight into his pocket.
  • Only a small part of the old prison is actually open to the public
  • With just about every place on this list (except Boggo Road Gaol) you are free to stay as long as you want, and are not herded out of the door after 1.5-2 hours.

This hit to the hip-pocket for the public is a result of not going with a much better community management model for Boggo Road Gaol. At a time when basic utility prices are going through the roof and families have to watch their leisure spending, is this really what we want to see happen with Queensland cultural heritage? So far, the people have spoken with their feet and stayed away from Boggo Road. This unique public asset now stands sadly under-used.

This is all just one other reason why Boggo Road should be run for public good, not personal profit, and why you should wait until it is opened properly under decent management before parting with your cash to go there.

* Places like St Helena Island require sea-going transport to get there so are not comparable price-wise for the purposes of this table 

Jack the Rip-off Strikes Again!

$
0
0




After the recent exposé on how the decision to hand interim management of Boggo Road Gaol to an anti-volunteer/anti-competition small businessman resulted in the old gaol becoming southeast Queensland’s most expensive heritage site to visit, I thought I’d take a look at how Boggo Road stacks up Australia-wide. The results are in the table below. 

There are plenty of old prisons across the country, and some of the larger ones you can visit are listed below. This not only shows how much it costs to get inside them, but also how long you can stay and what there is to do and see. Unfortunately, Boggo Road (the only place on the list not run on a not-for-profit basis) comes out very much the worst again.  

The emerging and obvious question is: Why is Boggo Road Gaol so expensive to visit when'Jack' Sim of Ghost Tours Pty Ltd was handed this publicly-owned place on a platter, RENT-FREE?

AUSTRALIAN HERITAGE GAOLS – WHAT YOU PAY AND WHAT YOU GET

Price (adult)
What you get
How long?
Where the money goes
PORT ARTHUR
$32 (Bronze Pass)
Access to more than 30 historic buildings; guided walking tour; harbour cruise;  interactive Visitor Centre experiences, Museum and Convict Study Centre, Access to the Convict Water Supply Trail, the Dockyard and the Coal Mines Historic Site at Saltwater River
5 hours (valid for two days)

Running the site
(not-for-profit)
BOGGO ROAD GAOL
$25
Tour of part of one cellblock, NO displays
2 hours
Personal profit
OLD MELBOURNE GAOL
$25
Gaol; historic Magistrate's Court; former Police City Watch House
Live performances of Ned Kelly Story, trial re-enactments, Watch House Experience
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
FREMANTLE PRISON
$19
Guided tour, prison art gallery, prison museum, convict museum
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
ADELAIDE GAOL
$18
Guided tour; museum; interactive displays
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
MAITLAND GAOL
$17
Self-guided audio tours
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
J WARD (ARARAT)
$16
Guided tours, displays
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
OLD DUBBO GAOL
$15
Self-guided tour of whole site; museum,  animatronic models and holographic displays
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
GEELONG GAOL
$10
Displays
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
HOBART PENITENTIARY CHAPEL
$10
Guided tours, displays
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)
OLD WENTWORTH GAOL
$8
Guided tours, displays
All day
Running the site
(not-for-profit)

BOGGO ROAD FAIL: NO 'FAIR & EQUITABLE' ACCESS - WHAT NEXT?

$
0
0


“A Deed of License has been entered into with Mr Jack Sim to open and operate from the No.2 division Boggo Road Gaol for an initial trial period of four months. The License requires Mr Sim to allow fair and equitable access by other organisations that wish to also use the site.”
This is what Public Works minister Tim Mander wrote to the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society on 7 January 2013, one month after he made similar statements to the press. It is unequivocal. Cameron ‘Jack’ Sim was contractually required to provide fair and equitable access to Boggo Road for other groups wanting to offer services there.

This was in fact one of the few conditions of this license we ever heard about. What the rest of this license says remains a veiled secret, because even though the Newman government handed commercial control of this public asset to a less-than-impressive small business without any tender process or the most basic fact checks, all the Right To Information attempts that we know of to actually see this license have been blocked.

Now, more than halfway through the trial period, with Boggo Road Gaol now established by Mr Sim as the most expensive heritage tourism site in southeast Queensland and the worst-value heritage gaol experience in the whole of Australia, and now severely under-performing, a 'Schedule of Fees' has finally been cobbledtogether by Mr Sim. Does this document provide the required fair and equitable access, and who is to judge? Surely the judges have to be the very third-party organisations this document was designed to provide that fair and equitable access for -  and the response from all quarters so far has been a resounding NO.

There are four big reasons why the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society believes this ‘Schedule of Fees’ to be unfair, inequitable and unacceptable, and these are:
  • Exorbitant fees
  • Timeshare access 
  • The 30-Day Rule
  • No competition allowed
1. EXORBITANT FEES

The first problem with the Schedule of Fees is the charge. We know that the license requires that "The Licensee must ensure that the costs imposed by the Licensee on third parties for making Third Party Bookings are subject to a reasonable, equitable and fair fee structure". So what do we get? Mr Sim demands that volunteers and community groups have to put $80-$120 in his pocket before they can take people through a public asset that he neither owns nor pays any rent for... and on what grounds?Well, as is written in his own words in the Schedule of Fees:
“Hire fees for Non-Profit/Non-Commercial Organisation Hirers to operate historical tours at the Gaol are designed to cover operational costs only, and encourage historical activities and experiences associated with Boggo Road.” (my emphasis)
So what are these ‘operational costs’ the $80-$120 is supposed to cover?
  • Rent? He’s not paying any.
  • Staff to open the prison? No, because the gaol will be open anyway because third parties are expected to run their tours at the same time as Mr Sim runs his tours. So his staff will be there anyway.
  • Electricity? Turning on about three dozen light bulbs for two hours would cost about $1. And of course that’s only for a night tour. And, once again, he will be using the gaol and electricity at the same time anyway.
So in reality there are no operational costs to even begin to justify the $80-$120 slug to community groups, andby his own reasoning (“Hire fees... are designed to cover operational costs only”) we should be paying about one dollar maximum to use Boggo Road (which is still more than Mr Sim pays). Are his fees "reasonable, equitable and fair" as contractually required? Of course not.

2. TIMESHARE ACCESS

Another glaring anomaly is that, having shelled out $80-$120 to Mr Sim for the privilege of getting into a public asset (which, remember, he neither owns nor pays any rent for), we don’t even get exclusive access for our customers because, as is stated in the Schedule, tours are to be “run on half-hour between regular public tours booked by Boggo Road Gaol Pty Ltd.”

So we have to run our tour while Mr Sim has other tour groups in there. Bearing in mind that only a small part of the gaol is open and space is very limited, this could easily lead to two completely different tour groups getting in each other’s way. We would have different pacing, different routines, and it is quite likely the groups end up in the same place at the same time with the different guides having to talk over each other. Noise overlap would be inevitable anyway, and the atmosphere of night tours in particular would be ruined.

This is unfair not only to us and our tour groups, but also to Mr Sim’s customers (who would also be paying twice as much as our customers to begin with).
 
3. THE 30-DAY RULE

Another requirement is that community groups have to book and pay for tours at least 30 days in advance. Now this obviously limits our ability to book tours at shorter notice or do one-offs. It also means we have to pre-book and pay for a specific date and time before we can market it and then hope we get enough customers to cover costs to Mr Sim.   

The question is, WHY do we have to book 30 days in advance? Normally this requirement would allow the licensee to plan ahead and know when the site is free for other activities, but this is only logical when exclusive access is provided. It makes absolutely no sense if we have to run our tours at the same time as his anyway. So there is no logical reason for the 30-day booking requirement, which appears to be designed purely to limit access and make life difficult for us.

4. NO COMPETITION ALLOWED

Mr Sim claims to be keen to promote the tourist industry, but apparently that only means his business. The Schedule of Fees explicitly states that no other private businesses can run tours there. So much for the free market, and Minister Mander's statement that "The License requires Mr Sim to allow fair and equitable access by other organisations that wish to also use the site".

There are also a number of other arbitrary clauses relating to paying bonds and safety inductions I won't go into here.

The production of this Schedule of Fees has been an exercise in incompetence. Not only did Mr Sim tell Public Works that he sent us a copy of the Schedule of Fees in December (a lie, because he never), but has so far taken four attempts to cobble together this inherently unfair document. The result is nothing more than an attempt to suppress competition (Mr Sim has always been opposed to people competing with him, free market be damned), and comes across as a greedy cash grab from volunteers and community groups in return for granting access to a public building he doesn’t own or pay for.

All this leads to the big question.It was a condition of Mr Sim’s Deed of License that he provided fair and equitable access to Boggo Road for third parties. He has FAILED to provide that fair and equitable access. Will his Deed of License now be revoked? We will now be asking this question of politicians and public servants, but what do YOU think? Comments are welcome below.

POSTSCRIPT

You know what the worst part of all this is? When Mr Sim started out in business the museum management let him have an office at Boggo Road and access for tours, sleepovers and other money-making activities over a number of years FOR FREE. $0.00. When he eventually did start paying a community group rent for this office space and access for activities, it was less (for a whole month) than what he now demands for allowing community groups in for a single two-hour tour. For years he exploited the generosity and community spirit of volunteers while doing what he could to minimise financial returns to Boggo Road. Now he is doing what he can to keep those volunteers out of Boggo Road and ripping them off for every last cent he can squeeze out of them.  


Where in Queensland was the Gallows Tree?

$
0
0


For oak and elm have pleasant leaves
  That in the spring-time shoot:
But grim to see is the gallows-tree,
  With its adder-bitten root,
And, green or dry, a man must die
  Before it bears its fruit!
(Oscar Wilde, The Ballad of Reading Gaol, c.1897)


93 men and one woman were hanged in the Queensland region from 1830-1913. That's 94 people in 83 years, hardly the carnival of judicial revengethat many people seem to think our colonial history was. It is, however, still a lot of people, so where in Queensland where they hanged? Unsurprisingly, the capital seat of capital punishment was Brisbane, where 80 souls were 'launched into eternity', and the shadow of the gallows fell across just three other towns across the colony. 
Locations of executions in Queensland 1830-1913 (©C Dawson 2013)

The first men to die on the gallows in Brisbane were two convicts hanged in the yard of the convict barracks on Queen Street, although most convicts sentenced to death for crimes committed in the Moreton Bay Penal Settlementwere executed in Sydney. In 1841 two Aborigines convicted of murder were hanged from improvised gallows on the side of the old windmill. 

The opening of the  first circuit sitting of the Supreme Court in Brisbane in 1850 ushered in a new era of criminal justice in the local area, and over the following decade eight men were hanged at the Queen Street Gaol. The first five were publicly executed on gallows in the street outside the gaol, with the remaining three being hanged inside a gaol yard after private execution legislation was passed in 1855.
The Queen Street Gaol circa 1850 (Queensland State Archives)
A new Brisbane Prison opened in 1860 on Petrie Terrace and became the scene of 26 hangings.Meanwhile, the newly-separate colony was expanding rapidly and thereach of the hangman extended to both Toowoomba and Rockhampton during the 1860s.A one-off hanging was held in Maryborough in 1877, with the lock-up there being proclaimed a gaol for the duration of the event. 

Petrie Terrace Gaol (S. Woolcock)

Rockhampton Gaol 1868
The opening of the new prison at Boggo Road, Brisbane, in 1883 led to the centralisation of Queensland capital punishment. The only hanging to take place outside of the city after that time was at Rockhampton in 1890, at a new gaol there. Although Boggo Road had a state-of-art gallows built inside one of the cellblocks, the first three men hanged there were actually executed together on the old gallows brought over from the now-demolished Petrie Terrace and erected in an exercise yard. The other 39 people executed at Boggo Road died inside 'A' Wing, in the old No.1 Division.
'A' Wing, Boggo Road, c.1915 (Comptroller-General's Report)
Gates of Rockhampton Gaol, c.1913 (Comptroller-General's Report)

While many other parts of Australia have preserved part of their hanging history, the only structure to survive out of these nine Queensland places is the windmill, now known as the Tower Mill. The A Wing of Boggo Road was demolished in the mid-1970s. There are no surviving gallows except for a part of the Boggo Road beam which now forms part of the artefact collection of the Royal Historical Society of Queensland. This scarcity of reminders of the hanging era is no doubt a legacy of Queensland becoming the first part of the old British Empire (in 1922) to abolish capital punishment, decades before the rest of Australia and Britain itself followed suit. If that is the case, it is to my mind a welcome price to pay. 

Top 10 Free Online History Resources for Queenslanders

$
0
0
For those of us who used to spend far too much time travelling from part of town to another to crawl through microform records and paperwork to get hold of some historical snippet or other and then all too often returning home empty-handed, the growing hoard of online data and records is a Godsend. I have listed some useful resources here (in no particular order), but of course have probably missed some. Please feel free to let me know of any good stuff I have missed.  
 
Trove
This National Library of Australia website features journals, pictures and other material, but it is the massive searchable range digitised newspapers going back to the 1800s that make this such a brilliant resource.

Queensland Speaks
Audio recordings of Queensland politicians and public servants talking about their life in public service during 1968-2008. Has a good search facility. Type in the word 'Boggo' and hear people explaining how nothing was ever their fault! From the UQ Centre for the Government of Queensland.

Text Queensland
Another excellent website from the UQ Centre for the Government of Queensland. This one gives online access to a whole range of theses, journals, government gazettes, almanacs, books and Hansard. Has a word search facility to make things easier. Saves a lot of time having to go and physically get a hold of these documents.

Queensland Places
Basic information about cities, suburbs, towns and villages in Queensland with a population of over 500.  Yet another great website from the UQ Centre for the Government of Queensland. 


Queensland Historical Atlas
The fourth and final offering from the UQ Centre for the Government of Queensland, this atlas features numerous peer-reviewed articles and of course plenty of great maps and images.


Picture Queensland
Thousands of pictures from the State Library of Queensland collection can be viewed here. Like most parts of the SLQ websites it can be a little bit tricky to navigate but very useful. Also excellent and much easier and quicker to use is Picture Ipswich, as well as Brisbane City Council's 'Brisbane Images'.
 
Australian Cemeteries Index
Compiled by a network of individuals and community groups, this website features listings for 191 Queensland cemeteries, sometimes with photos of headstones. An excellent resource for those searching for graves. The South Brisbane cemetery section, with info from the FOSBC, is especially good.

Australian Dictionary of Biography
Produced by the Australian National University's 'National Centre of Biography', this online version of the books first published in 1966 features hundreds of biographies of prominent Australians. Obviously only useful for the more famous people, but still a very handy and reliable resource.   

Queensland Births, Deaths & Marriages
This Department of Justice and Attorney-General website features a great search facility for tracking births, deaths and marriages back through the 19th century.

Queensland State Archives
There's never as much online digital records as we'd like these days, but the Queensland State Archives website is coming on well, going from a simple search facility to throwing up some pleasant surprises with it's online material. Still the number 1 stop for prison records.

John Andrew Stuart and Jim Finch: Double Trouble

$
0
0
John Andrew Stuart (left) and Jim Finch (right)
Tomorrow (8 March) is 40 years to the day since Brisbane’s'Whiskey au Go Go' nightclub was firebombed. Five gallons of petrol were ignited in the foyer of the packed Fortitude Valley club, and 15 people were killed in the panic that followed. It was, until the Port Arthur shootings of 1996, modernAustralia's worst mass murder.

John Andrew Stuart and Jim Finch were the two men sentenced to life for the firebombing. Stuart and Finch were both violent men and had spent most of their adult lives embroiled in gangland feuds over rich prostitution and gambling rackets in the south. They claimed that they had been framed for the murders, and their protests of innocence were incredible, as were their attempts to delay the trial. Much has been written about the case and the guilt or innocence of the two men over the years, and I understand that today a Queensland MP will stand in parliament and name the person he claims was actually responsible for the crime.  Stuart and Finch have already gone down as two of the most notorious prisoners in the history of Boggo Road Gaol, and whatever happens today will only add to the legend.

While being held in the now-demolished No.1 Division of the prison, Stuart and Finch desperately tried to convince everyone that they were innocent. At one time Stuart silently sewed his lips together with a paper clip. On other occasions he ate wire crosses and nails that lodged in his gut. This required him to go to hospital for treatment and so delayed the trial. This inspired other prisoners to do the same. He even climbed up on the roof of the old A Wing for three days in 1977 and pulled out dozens of bricks with his bare hands to spell out the words 'INNOCENT - VICTIM OF POLICE VERBAL' on the roof. Two officers were eventually sent up to retrieve Stuart, who was by this time riddled with bird lice.

A favourite trick of Stuart’s was to greet the officers unlocking his cell door of a morning by throwing the contents of his toilet tub over them. Many a new officer got a soaking like this. Some thought Stuart had a masochistic streak, and he would taunt groups of prison officers who had just bashed him with words like ‘is the best you can do?’, almost willing them to do it again.

His actions sparked riots and won him widespread support both inside and outside the prison, but he was never released. Stuart died of a heart infection (idiopathic myocarditis), alone in his cell on New Years Day 1979. He had been on hunger strike for six days. 

Finch's finger
Jim Finch also made memorable protests, including a 35-day hunger strike. His most famous stunt was to have the top of one of his fingers cut off at the same time as swallowing a wire cross. He falsely claimed that he bit the finger off himself. I understand that this bit of finger was kept for years in a jar (and may still be around somewhere) and at one point after his release Finch put in an unsuccessful official request to have it returned.  

He was a fitness fanatic and was known as 'The Chinaman' because he would jog with two buckets of water suspended from each end of a prison mop over his shoulders. He later settled down to become a supposedly 'model' prisoner, although he was still regarded as a violent thug by some inside Boggo Road and certainly ruled the roost in his exercise yard. He did however, have a knack for staying out of trouble and was often suspected of deliberately getting himself sent to the Detention Cells for minor infringements just before any major trouble was due to break out in the prison. 

He began keeping budgerigars and became known to some as the 'Birdman of Boggo Road'. Finch had a real affection for these birds, making sure they were looked after during his time in detention. When two birds werekilled by smoke fumes during a November 1982 prison riot an angry Finch wrote the following messages on a yard wall:

(Queensland
Prisons Collection)
“Who ever is responsible for the death of my two birds Chirpy and The Whistler is challenged to a fight to the death”

“Chirpy, The Whistler. Killed by the gutless actions of weak prisoners.”

“JA* will look after them in Heaven.”

“Stumpy sends his love. Also Kevie and Fatty.”

(* JA = John Andrew Stuart. Maybe Stumpy, Kevie and Fatty were birds too. Or perhaps inmates.)

We can safely assume that this 'fight to the death' never happened. Finch was also a boxing expert, and loved to get officers to quiz him on boxing trivia using a set of little quiz cards he owned. He knew every answer. He campaigned and wrote a lot of letters and drummed up support for his release, and in 1986 he even got married to one of his supporters while in prison. In 1988 he was released and deported to his native England, where his new wife soon became aware of his violent side and left after a few months. Finch, who found work as a nightwatchman, later confessed his guilt in the Whiskey au Go-Go case to a journalist before changing his story again after being informed that he had only been sentenced for one murder and could be charged with the others. He has since died. 

Whether guilty or innocence, Stuart and Finch certainly left their mark on Boggo Road history. Although the scene of their incarceration has long gone, the stories of their time inside will continue to be told.

Ghost Hunts, Charlatans, and ‘Psychopathic Liars’

$
0
0


There’s been plenty written in the Boggo Blogabout some of the dodgy goings-on and characters in the ‘paranormal industry’. These articles might seem a bit harsh sometimes, but then I believe that if people get involved in my fields of research and lie through their teeth or act like the Age of Reason never happened then I'm entitled/duty-bound to hold them to account. Somebody has to. So we get articles about ridiculous ghost-hunting wannabes, outright lies about fake National Geographic polls, ghost stories changed to suit the circumstances, and photos of things that are not what they are claimed to be. 

I know some genuinely good people in the paranormal field, but there’s some real pieces of work too. One group we had particular problems with a few years back was Queensland Paranormal Investigators, who ran Ghost Hunts with Cameron ‘Jack’ Sim of Ghost Tours. These ghost hunts (which were a dismal flop)were held in places like South Brisbane Cemetery and were also planned for Boggo Road.* QPI worked with Sim in trying to scare off 'competition', and let’s just say that during the period when we were planning our South Brisbane Cemetery Moonlight Tours they were rather antagonistic. 

I honestly do try to moderate my own language in these pages, but others have been harsher. Stephen Downes, a contributor to Channels 9’s A Current Affair, pulled out of show after ACA aired an uncritical segment on the ghost hunts offered by QPI/Ghost Tours in early 2010. He didn’t hold back in this article 'Who ya gonna call? Ghost boasters apparently':
All right, so QPI will be dismissed by most people as an hilarious loser... But how can ACArisk its credibility as a “scam-busting” program by presenting complete and utter bullsh-t such as this? As someone who has appeared on ACAfrom time to time to comment on marketing issues — drawing on published studies in consumer behaviour and peer-reviewed academic literature on marketing and brand management — I actually feel embarrassed to have been seen in the same company as these charlatans.
Harsh words, but nowhere near as harsh as those used by the folks who run the website exposing ‘Australia and New Zealand Military Imposters’ (ANZMI). These are very passionate people who do not mince words, and in a recent exposé about a military imposter they opened up with this:
A psychopathic liar has no conscience, no feelings of guilt or remorse, and he cares not afig for the well being of friends or family members he betrays. He does not struggle with shame no matter what kind of harmful or immoral lies he tells.
And it kinda goes downhill from there. They are talking about Shane Townsend, a founder of Queensland Paranormal Investigators who is seen in this photo with his Ghost Hunts partner ‘Jack’ Sim.

Queensland Times, 19 January 2010
It’s a long article that you really have to see to believe. They write:
As a further insight into the personality of Townsend, he claims in media reports and on web sites to be a Psychic Medium and claims to have been tested at the University of Canberra and the ABC Testing unit for gifted children. His claims of being a gifted Psychic are for those gullible people silly enough to believe him, we do however know that he is a gifted liar. Townsend has:
Lied about having served with SASR
Lied about serving in Cambodia, Iraq and Afghanistan
Lied about being a decorated soldier
L
ied about his academic qualifications
Lied about serving with USA Navy SEALs
Lied about serving in the RAN
Falsely worn a DCM
Falsely worn 3RAR Parachute wings
Falsely worn and Infantry Combat Badge
Falsely worn other medals that have not been awarded to him
Produced numerous false military documents
Those who were offended by Shane and the Ghost Tours/QPI people 'ghost hunting' around war graves in the South Brisbane Cemetery on some juvenile TV show a few years back will sense the karma in all this.

Like I said before, I know good people who dabble in the paranormal, but shonky characters are attracted to the paranormal industrylike moths to a flame. It is not a science, it is not regulated, there is no definable right or wrong way of doing it, it lends an air of mystery to otherwise suburban personalities, and you get to deal with some very impressionable people and maybe even get to take their money.When these types try and make it hard for us to carry out our not-for-profit History activities it gets frustrating, but people like Liam Baker over at the Haunts of Brisbane do a damn good job of trying tolift standards and represent the new breed of paranormal researchers who have integrity, ethics and maturity. 

Ifor my part will continue to try and hold to dodgy behaviour to account when it overlaps into my Boggo  Road and cemetery work. 'Hilarious losers', 'complete and utter bullshit', 'charlatans', 'psychopathic liar'. Harsh words, but not mine. The ANZMI website puts it well:
If you tell the truth it becomes part of your past.
If you tell a lie it becomes part of your future.

*Senior Public Works officials have told me that ghost hunts will not be permitted inside Boggo Road Gaol. 

"They’re too soft on them these days" says ex-officer after Boggo Road riot (in the 1920s)

$
0
0
‘BOGGO ROAD RIOTS!’ Three little words that conjure up images of prisoners on roofs, protesters in the street, fire engines, smashed windows, phalanxes of riot squads, and burning cells. Scenes that put Boggo Road in the newspapers several times during the 1970s and ‘80s. However, this history of violent resistance to authority at the prison goes back a bit further than you might think, and the Roaring ‘Twenties had their fair share of prison troubles too. 

Back in 1921 the female prisoners were moved out of their under-populated cellblocks in the Women’s Prison at Boggo Road and housed in a smaller building on the reserve. Their former home was quickly filled with a quite different type of prisoner, being men serving long sentences and transferred to the prison from St Helena Island in Moreton Bay. The former Female Division became No.2 Division, in effect a maximum-security prison for the worst offenders in the system.

Boggo Road Gaol, 1929 (State Library of Quensland)
Trouble flared up one morning a few months later when the inmates asked to have shutters removed from the windows of what is now F Wing. The gaol governor refused, fearing that if the shutters were removed then the prisoners would be able to communicate to people outside on Annerley Road. After lunch that day the 78 prisoners were mustered to return to the workshops but about 30 of them, described as ‘old-timers and Southern criminals’, refused to go. They were on strike. The recalcitrant prisoners were each locked in their cells, and continued to refuse to work. That evening they began shouting and singing, alerting the public outside that something was wrong. The next day a visiting magistrate came to Boggo Road and increased the sentence of each striker, and all the men returned to work. 

Stewart Creek Prison, 1914 (SLQ)
An escape incident in 1923, coupled with a stabbing and rumours of 'other trouble caused by the prisoners' led to calls for staff reinforcements and an inquiry into the wisdom of transferring the long-termers over from St Helena. In 1925 the Home Secretary, James Stopford, had to admit that 'revolts are frequent in prisons, not only in Queensland but in other States'. This statement came after a string of incidents, including a late 1924 fight involving Boggo Road inmates that left one man badly wounded after being stabbed, another Boggo Road man holding a hunger strike, and a dozen men in Stewart Creek prison, Townsville, being charged with 'refusing to work, destruction of property, gross insubordination, assault on an officer, threatening prison officials, and obscene language'.

Worse was to come in June 1926. Trouble had been brewing in No.2 Division for months and discipline had reportedly become so lax that some long-timers would not follow some warders’ orders, instead answering them with ‘vile language’. During lunch hours they ‘danced to the music of a gramophone’ and resented any interference to their perceived rights. The warders feared that an outbreak of violence was inevitable.

It came one morning when over 20 prisoners in No.2 Division were being escorted into the prison bootshop. The officer in charge was Warder Simpson, described as the ‘bete noir of the prisoners because of his strict regard for prison rules’, and on this morning the body of prisoners savagely attacked him without warning. He was being ‘badly mauled’ and had to be rescued by warders Ralson and Dwyer, both of whom were also attacked with one of them ending upbadly injured. The officers managed to get out of the bootshop while the inmates smashed the bootmaking equipment and threw it into the yard outside. The disturbance was suppressed when other officers arrived on the scene from No.1 Division, and the prisoners were escorted to their cells. 21 of them had their sentences prolonged by one to six months as a result of this ‘riot’. There was a brief flare-up again a few days later with men refusing to carry out some duties, but this was quickly dealt with.

Boggo Road bootshop, 1967
In the aftermath of this incident public details emerged of a prison under strain. One ex-warder, interviewed in the Brisbane Courier, claimed that gaol discipline was ‘practically non-existent’ and that warders were sometimes reprimanded in front of the inmates for charging prisoners with misdemeanours. Staff unrest was rife, and unhappy warders were said to have resigned because of the perceived lack of discipline. He claimed that their firearms were obsolete and useless in an emergency, and that prisoners in the yard would without consequence throw stones at the sentries on the wall. 

The same ex-warder claimed that a number of causes were behind the problems, including temporary warders who did not wear uniforms and did not have the required authority to lock prisoners up. these men were openly defied. Alcohol, specifically rum, was commonly drunk by the prisoners and it was initially suspected that warders were smuggling in alcohol after a tin supposedly containing treacle was found to be filled with rum. A search of warder’s bags turned nothing up, and it was concluded that the rum was coming in via visitors.

Fast forward several decades and you will hear former Boggo Road officers looking back at the much bigger riots of the 1980s and blaming it on (in part) the negative influence of ‘southern criminals’ and lax managerial attitudes. It really does seem that the more things change, the more they stay the same!
Viewing all 246 articles
Browse latest View live