Quantcast
Channel: Life & Death in the Sunshine State
Viewing all 246 articles
Browse latest View live

Land of Coal & Corn (#1): The Foundation of Ipswich

$
0
0
(This article is reproduced from the Brisbane Courier, 20 October 1891.)

'Writing to Governor Darling on the l6th December 1828, Allan Cunningham, the explorer, made use of the following words – ‘It is therefore highly probable that upon the site of those limestone hills a town will one day be raised’. Some two months before the penning of the despatch which contained this sentence,Cunningham had rested for awhile on the calcareous hummocks called the Limestone Hills, on the right bank of the Bremer River, and almost on the very spot where the Ipswich Girls’ Grammar School now stands What was the sight which then presented itself to him? 

Down at his feet he could trace the river Bremer flashing in and out, turning and winding with ever-varying curve, and at every bend presenting a new scene of loveliness. Its banks were fresh with spring growth, and richly tangled with vegetation, while the grass trees reared their heads from the open flats - queer apparitions in a singularly beautiful land. Stretching from the riverbanks in many parts were open flats which lost themselves in the low hills beyond, and those, too, finally merged in the great mountains in the background to which Cunningham’s eyes were directed, and on the other side of which he discovered a land of promise. The country was of a fine undulating nature, open apple tree flats, low hills and forest grounds, well-watered, and every thing looked fair and promising.

Allan Cunningham (John Oxley Library)
Allan Cunningham (John Oxley Library)
There was the blemish of sin upon it, however. On yon hill a party of convicts were at work, guarded by British soldiers armed with the old Brown Bess, and their work consisted of lime burning. From a great kiln built on the slope of a hill the fumes of lime arose in a white, transparent cloud, and near its mouth the broad-arrow branded coat of the convict was in close juxtaposition to the scarlet coat of the soldier of the 20thor 40th Regiment. Away down on the river lay two boats which were manned by convicts and guarded by soldiers, and were being loaded with baskets of lime to be conveyed to Brisbane Town, there to be used to build that old convict barrack which for so long a time disfigured Queen street.

On the flats and undulating grounds lying to the north east a small flock of Government sheep were grazing, and half a mile from the lime kiln was a small patch of country of ‘black colour,’ which, if one might judge from the luxuriant growth of vegetables cultivated in a small patch of golden ground belonging to the soldiers, was of rich quality. Around the lime-burning station the aboriginals were frequently observed prowling through the woods, indeed they had the presumption to threaten the lives of his Majesty’s soldiers guarding his Majesty’s convicts who were burning the aboriginals’ lime, and a corporal and three privates were on guard ready to shoot to the death the first aboriginal who dared to object.

The scene was an interesting one then, it is a particularly interesting one to look back upon now. Cunningham’s keen eyes observed the possibilities of the land he was studying. He noticed chalk among the hills, and coal in the Bremer River and in the steep banks of dry creeks dipping to Brisbane. He also noticed the black soil country, the land clothed with grasses, the navigable nature of the Bremer, and he thereupon draws deductions and writes to his chief, ‘It is therefore highly probable that upon the site of these limestone hills a town will one day be raised’. His prophetic vision has long been realised, and Ipswich is today a flourishing town placed on the limestone hills, in the heart of a vast coal and corn producing district.

One little extract from Cunningham’s despatch is, in the light of recent events, worth quoting. He wrote thus sixty-three years ago: - ‘Bremer’s River, which at its mouth is about forty yards wide, preserves a uniformity of breadth of thirty and thirty-five yards throughout its tortuous course of ten miles to the Limestone Station, which point may be considered the head of navigation, for almost immediately beyond ledges of rock occupy the bed of the river, which at length rises and separates the fresh water from the salt. To this station (up to which the tide flows) the Bremer is of sufficient depth to be navigable for boats or craft of thirty or forty tons, and as it expands and forms a natural basin a short distance below the station of upwards of one hundred yards in width and with a depth of water sufficient to float a large ship, the importance of building a wharf on the right hand bank of this basin, to which the produce of the interior might be conveyed to be embarked, will at some future day be seen. The circumstance, moreover, of this river being thus far navigable for craft of a certain class, and the consequent saving to the farmer of that expense which is necessarily attendant on the wear and tear of a long land carriage of internal produce to the coast, cannot possibly fail when this country becomes settled on to be duly considered.’
 
Ipswich landing place, Nov 24, 1851 1851, Conrad Martens (Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales)
Ipswich landing place, Nov 24, 1851 1851, Conrad Martens
(
Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales)

The earliest glimpse of Ipswich is a scene where a few criminals are expiating their offences against the laws of the mother land, and in so doing are turning to account the natural products of a new country, and in a rough rude way laying the foundations of a great manufacturing town. It is evident that for some years Limestone remained in the possession of the Government and was used as a convict station, but the lime kilns, which may be seen even at the present day, were apparently not used for any great length of time. The flats were cultivated by the soldiers, and vegetables and corn were sent down to the garrison at Brisbane Town, to be used in conjunction with Limestone-bred beef and mutton. When, in consequence of Cunningham’s discovery of the pastoral lands of the Darling Downs, this colony (then part of New South Wales) was declared freed from the convict bond, and the New South Wales squatters began to turn their attention to the rich lands lying out from Brisbane, Limestone at once rose to a place of importance. For one thing it was the head of navigation, and it was from the apple-tree flats on the banks of the Bremer that teams were loaded with rations for the newly laid out stations on the Downs. Nearly all the passengers who came from Sydney in the steamer Sovereign in March of 1843 - the first trading steamer, I believe, which ever came to Brisbane - went to Limestone. Many of them were under engagement to the squatters, and were bound for the Condamine, Cecil Plains, Jimbour, or the big plains beyond Dalby. A blazed track showed the way to these important stations, and the means of climbing the Main Range were as may be supposed, both primitive and dangerous, while the blacks were numerous but shy. Limestone was at this time the depot of the squatters, their meeting place, and in fact the hub of the northern parts of New South Wales. Brisbane with its gaol, its ‘female factory,’ and other undesirable concomitants was looked down upon and despised by the Ipswich people as indeed it was for many a year even after separation had taken place.

In 1843 Governor Gipps visited Moreton Bay, and in company with Surveyor Warner, Surveyor Wade, Andrew Petrie, George Thorn, and others proceeded to Limestone in an open boat examining and surveying the river Bremer. When the open basin on the Bremer was reached it was suggested by the surveyors to land and lay out the town on that portion of the land now known as North Ipswich. However, the Governor suggested that they should proceed further up the river, which was accordingly done, and the party stepped ashore at the point now known as the old wharves. Limestone was then an apple-tree flat with a pleasant appearance, probably rendered more so by the fact that a flock of sheep and a few cattle were grazing on the land. There were then only one or two houses on the flat, a Government hut, and a stockyard and some cultivated land near what is now known as Bundamba Creek. The Governor was struck with the place, a new township was speedily laid out, and duly and officially christened as Ipswich. The first section of the town was at once marked out, including East-street and Bell-street, the former being the first street laid out and named in Ipswich. It is questionable if Governor Gipps did well in changing the name of the place. Limestone is not an unmusical name, and it was at least suggestive of the formation of the surrounding country, while Ipswich has neither grace nor association nor anything else to recommend it. It may be truly said that the evil which men do lives after them. A portion of the land surveyed was sold the same year, and people steadily flocked into the new township, or pitched their camp on the rich flats reaching out from the banks of the Bremer.

In 1844 much land was taken up on the Brisbane River by the M’Connels, Biggs, and others, and a great many selections were stocked. From 1844 until separation the town and district steadily moved forward. All goods for the squatters in the south-west and western districts went to Ipswich, and trade became so brisk that the squatters combined and sent to Sydney for a steamer, Mr. Pearce, of Helidon, undertaking the delicate commission. This great event occurred either in ‘48 or ‘49. The little steamer purchased was called The Experiment, and for two years it plied between Ipswich and Brisbane. It was afterwards joined by The Hawk, Breadalbane, The Settler, and, if I mistake not, The Bremer. Trade was brisk in those good old days, and Ipswich was in the very plenitude of its prosperity when separation came in 1859.'

The steamer 'Breadalbane'. (John Oxley Library)
The steamer 'Breadalbane'. (John Oxley Library)

Letter to the Editor
(Brisbane Courier, 22 October 1891, p6)

'Sir,-I should like to supplement your travelling reporter’s remarks about Ipswich. It is true, as he says, that Ipswich used to despise Brisbane before ‘separation,’ but not for the reason he assigns; for the convict tarbrush stained both places alike. It was because ‘Limestone’ was rich and Brisbane poor; for in those days the wool teams came no further down than Ipswich, which was the head of punt and steamer navigation, and all the teamsters’ cheques, and shepherds and stockmen’s cheques and cash from Darling Downs and West Moreton were spent in Ipswich. Brisbane never saw a halfpenny of them, and only the Kilcoy and Durundur and Nanango bushmen, with a contingent from the Logan and Albert, supported Brisbane. All the money circulated in Ipswich, and it once, it is said, had thirty flourishing hotels, and it certainly exceeded Brisbane on the electoral roll of voters of the joint Stanley boroughs. But Brisbane generally carried the elections by ‘bundling’ its candidates; while Ipswich candidates, hot headed and energetic (like the people) opposed each other and split the votes. Ipswich, in New South Wales, like Tamworth and other pastoral townships of that colony, revelled in abundance of money in old times, and there was always more life, energy, and enterprise all round in Ipswich than in Brisbane, so much nearer to the enervating sea air.

Still, poor Brisbane held up its head and assumed metropolitan airs. The Government Resident lived there. The Hon. Thomas Holt gave it a £30,000 gaol in 1859, and at the first sales of town lands, Brisbane was put up at the rate of £100 an acre upset for ‘town lots,’ while Ipswich upset was £8 an acre as ‘village lots.’ This showed, at all events, what ‘our stepmother Sydney’ thought of her two Moreton Bay bantlings in the ‘early forties.’ To the names of the steamers mentioned by your correspondent should be added the Swallow, Captain Bousfield. The A.S.N. Company found their cargoes (freight paid from Sydney to Ipswich) blocked for want of river steamers in Brisbane, so they sent up the Brisbane, Captain Patullo, the Samson and the Ipswich, which formed part of our river fleet from 1855 to 1860, and till the railway killed them. Severe jokes were bandied in those days. The sheriff of the period, hearing that Ipswich was jealous of Brisbane getting the gaol, offered to make Ipswich the official residence of the hangman, on the principle, as he said, of ‘bringing justice home to every man’s door,’ and there is a venerable legend of a little foreign storekeeper, who brought up a schooner full of ‘notions’ from Sydney, intending to open business in Brisbane; it is alleged that he climbed the old windmill and counted seven public-houses and nine chapels, and muttered, ‘Dis vill not do; dese peeples vill know too much for me,’ and he sold his cargo by auction; and returned to Port Jackson. Had he gone on to Limestone where the public-houses then far outnumbered the chapels, the district might not have lost him. The Platypus, an ocean steamer of 350 tons, went to Ipswich once. It was regarded as a great feat in navigation but the experiment was not repeated.
I am, sir, &c., N. BARTLEY.'



Within the Walls of Brisbane Gaol (1883): ‘For Trial’

$
0
0

(These articles are reproduced from the Queensland Figaro, January-February 1883, and describe aspects of life in HM Prison, Brisbane, which at that time was located at Petrie Terrace. It was written from the perspective of the walls, in an 'if these walls could talk' scenario. This particular article focussed on the experiences of prisoners committed for trial. The prison at Petrie Terrace closed in July 1883when it wassuperseded by the Boggo Road prison.

'The prisoner on remand may have a few days only to wait for trial, or he may have the best part of 6 months. In the latter case he comes from the country and has had the misfortune to be committed for trial just after a local gaol delivery. As the Supreme Court criminal sittings are held only twice in the year except in the metropolis these long periods of waiting for trial are common enough.

Prisoners are not all poor men. Some of them have plenty of money if not with them behind them. Truly one half the world does not know how the other half lives. The process of which prisoners with money set about their defence bears a similarity in all cases. The criminal lawyer of the hour is sent for. Very likely he is on the ground touting for business and it is astonishing how they can scent out the moneyed men. The interview between lawyer and client is private. The prisoner states his case with consider able freedom no, matter what rascality is involved, admits his guilt off hand and is prepared to go in for an elaborate scheme of defence, only he is stopped by the man of the law with a suggestion as to terms first.

Terms occupy some time, in discussing. The lawyer has got the hopeless side of the case before him and says, ‘Well, I can get you out of it but it will cost money. We shall have to 'ready-up' a witness or two in order to have a chance with the ____ jury.’

Brisbane Gaol, Petrie Terrace. (S Woolcock 1988)
They settle it between them and at the next interview the jury list; if it ready is most carefully scanned. The prisoner dots off all the men he knows and all those his friends know, and every effort will be made to influence those men beforehand with a carefully prepared; story on the chance of their being got on to the jury. The Crown may order some of; them to stand aside, but out of a panel of forty-eight a prisoner has hard luck if he does not get three men on to his jury who, he knows, will not let him be convicted. Who can say the extent to which law breaking is carried? Of those three men one is a publican one a storekeeper, and one a selector. The prisoner has had dealings with each. He has assisted the publican in the carriage, or perhaps, the manufacture of sly grog. The storekeeper is, the owner of a couple of good horses with defaced brands, which he picked up from a shepherd out back ; and on that selector's selection run a lot of cattle with his own brand on them which he never bred or bought. But so it is, and the prisoner comes up for trial with a family air, and is most tremendously taken in if he is found guilty. Collusion, as any Crown prosecutor knows, is common enough.      

It is rather different on going to trial in the city. The jury list cannot be altogether relied on so the main idea is to get a leading witness out of the way. This is difficult to do, but when there is money it can be done and is done. Another resource greatly relied on is to induce a leading witness who cannot be got out of the way to make a qualifying admission at the trial, under the greatest pressure of cross-examination of course, which he or she would not make before the committing bench of magistrates, Money effects this object. Money does a lot of things the public knows very little about in the way of proving guilty men innocent and setting them on the world again. One way to get a horse-stealer off is for another either a mate or specially , employed and paid, to steal the stolen horse from the police paddock, ride him till he drops in some sequestered spot, where he is killed and burnt. As the police can't produce the stolen animal at the trial the case breaks down, and as they only catch one horse-stealer in fifty it is 49 to 1 they don't catch the mate who took the stolen horse out of the police paddock. Into the mysteries of branding - how to alter, deface, turn new brands into old, and the other minutiae - I need not now induct you.

All this can be learnt in gaol and more besides.'

Also in the 'Within The Walls of Brisbane Gaol' series:

Old Queensland Prisons #15: Thursday Island Prison (1891-1983)

$
0
0
Thursday Island, in the Torres Straits between Cape York and Papua New Guinea, has been populated for thousands of years and is known in the local language as Waiben.

The island became a Queensland Government administrative centre for the strategically-important Torres Straits in 1877, and during the 1880s a lucrative pearling industry developed there, attracting a multicultural workforce from places such as Japan, Malaysia, India and the South Sea Islands.

The prison there started life as a police lockup and by 1885 had two cells and staff quarters. The prisoners held at this time were described in government records as being ‘nearly all of the coloured races and mostly sailors, very few of whom speak English’. As hard labour, they were made to cut wood for the government, or work as sailors and sailmakers on government ships.

As economic activity at the island grew, so did the prison population and the lockup was extended to six cells in 1887, and an eight-person ward was added in 1890.

'Thursday Island, 1879' by Thomas Glover (National Library of Australia)

The lockup was officially declared as HM Prison, Thursday Island, in February 1891. This allowed it to hold prisoners serving sentences over 14 days, saving the expense of sending them to mainland prisons. The buildings were improved in 1895, allowing up to 40 prisoners to be housed there. At the time the population of the island was about 2,000 and the daily average number of inmates was 15.

One of the more famous criminals to be held there Hatsuro Abe, a Japanese sailor and pearl diver who killed his lover on the island in 1894 and was eventually hanged at Brisbane's Boggo Road for the crime. During the following year, Filipino man Frank Tinyana stabbed Senior Constable William Conroy to death during a struggle on the island and he too was sent to Brisbane for execution.

Government residency, Thursday Island, circa 1910. The gaol is in the foreground. (State Library Qld)

Thursday Island prison remained open during the 20th century but by the 1970s the main section had decayed away and the prison had shrunk to a two-cell facility with a daily average of three prisoners. A government report in 1980 described it as empty and ‘virtually useless’, and it was demolished in 1980-81 to make way for a ‘Police and Prison’ complex, but construction on the new facility was deferred. In the meantime, short-term inmates were kept in the island watch-house and longer-term prisoners were shipped to Townsville or Rockhampton. In July 1983 the island prison was officially declared closed.
PREVIOUS: Old Queensland Prisons #14: Police Lockups of 1887 Learn all about the extensive network of police lockups around Queensland in the 1880s.

Within The Walls of Brisbane Gaol (1883): 'Refactory Prisoners'

$
0
0
(Queensland Figaro, 10 February 1883)
(These articles are reproduced from the Queensland Figaro, January-February 1883, and describe aspects of life in HM Prison, Brisbane, which at that time was located at Petrie Terrace. It was written from the perspective of the walls, in an 'if these walls could talk' scenario. This particular article focussed on refactory inmates who caused further trouble while being held inside prison. The prison at Petrie Terrace closed in July 1883when it wassuperseded by the Boggo Road prison.)   

NOTE: The following article contains racist sentiments that were sadly typical of the day.

‘Refactory prisoners commence by falling out with their fellow-prisoners, then with the warders then with the gaolers. They are commonly of the bullying class, and with very unruly tempers. They think they can do as they like, and not as they are ordered. They invariably shirk their work, and are always getting their allowances stopped (when they are lucky enough to get any allowances) for insubordination. They are always trying to get other prisoners into scraps, and contrive to elude; much of the small punishments which they should have borne.

The first punishment of a refractory prisoner is being sent to his cell; he is brought up before the gaoler next morning, and perhaps let off with a warning; the second time he is not so lucky; he has been guilty of some flagrant breach of discipline, and is brought before the visiting justice; and seven days in the dark cell is awarded him.

The dark cell is a building below the level of the ground. You go down a flight of steps into it. There are in fact two cells one to the right of the stairs, one to the left. Not a ray of light of any description can enter. There are double doors, and bare walls and floor. It is full of fleas, and has a kind of dungeon atmosphere about it, not easily described. Twenty-four ounces of bread and two quarts of water is the allowance for twenty-four hours. This is put in at noon of each day, and for seven days that is the only indication you have of what time it is. 

(Queensland Figaro, 6 January 1883)

We walls know something about what seven days in the black hole is. A man we recollect got seven days. He told us afterwards something like this;- ‘I tried to make out , my case before the visiting justice, but the evidence was on the other side. Smarting with the injustice of the sentence, I could have murdered anyone who touched me. Twenty-four hours was endurable, but it was summer-time, and the heat grew intolerable on the second day, or sometime before the bread and water came round for the second time. I drank all the water straight off in the first half hour, and was soon raging with thirst again. I tried to keep still and quiet, but it was no use. Imagination soon began to work. I felt loathsome, reptiles crawl over me and yelled with fright at their clammy touch. I saw the hangman with his ghastly face, trying to catch hold of me. I felt from corner to corner of the narrow cell. I shouted at the top of my voice for assistance and prayed to be let out. I fought with the wall and fell down bruised and helpless in the effort. The momentary exhaustion passed and again I wrestled with the hangman and his crew, I suffered all the tortures of uncontrollable thirst, and finally lost consciousness.

How long unconsciousness lasted I have no idea. There was another day's ration in the cell, when I once more became aware of the locality. And the day after there came another ration.(So long as prisoners ramp and rave in the dark cell it is all right; they can stay in, but it was too quiet now, and on the fifth day they investigated the cell.) I don't know much about that investigation but it was conceded that I had had enough of the 'black hole.' So I had; for then and always.

A worse punishment affecting the body is the lash. A prisoner will have to be very insubordinate before this is inflicted, but it can be inflicted for continued insubordination. I have seen two men flogged. Everybody, that is the prisoners in the gaol, was drawn up near the triangle, so that a due impression might be conveyed to them. The common hangman makes his appearance, pulls off his coat, rolls up his sleeve, draws the cat through his fingers, and if he can get the chance puts a few more knots in it. The culprit is stripped to the waist and fastened up, the doctor takes up his position, the word is given, the lash whistles through the air and falls with all the weight the old flagellator can put into it across the delinquent's back. He is a heavy flogger in spite of his age and a deep red mark where the blow fell, a second, a third, and fourth follow; the red lines deepen and swell, and as the remainingblows of the sentence are given, blood flows freely, and the flogger's left hand is all bloody as he draws the cat through after every stroke to clear it of the blood, bits of skin, and flesh.

It is a sickening sight. What must it be to the man who feels it. Men of different powers of endurance take it in different ways. Some scream, and yell, and writhe, and give every outward expression of the torture; others control themselves until the last strokes; an occasional one endures it without a sign, but these are very rare. The two I saw were of the first and last descriptions. You could have heard the screams of one a mile off; the other put on his coat as if nothing had happened. It is a terrible ordeal all the same. A few months ago a man was flogged down the river. He was found dead in his cell four days afterwards. But he wasn't flogged to death of course. Oh no! He died of ‘general debility.’

The Petrie Terrace prison buildings can be seen in this 1860s photo (State Library Qld)

Close confinement to your cell is bad enough for ordinary punishments in the summer-time. A number of very rowdy men came in once, who were ordered to be closely confined to their cells, and allowed one hour's exercise only a day. It was the height of summer. They were men of stony constitutions, and devil may care fellows, and they had offended against no law of the Queen or country, but they got within the walls and may be there yet. Nobody cared whether they lived or died.

The ventilation of the cells is bad at any time; in summer they become regular stink-houses. In addition to this, the drains where everything is deposited are right under the one end of the ward mostly used now. On opening the cell doors on a hot summer's morning, the rush of foul air nearly knocks the warders down. They will tell you so themselves. If it is bad for them what must it be for the men who are in those cells for thirteen hours on end. You will see them all through the night with their faces close against the grating over the door, trying to catch a breath of less poisonous atmosphere than reigns within. In the old days before the work shops were removed it was worse, for then you had to put up with this atmosphere by day and by night. Yet men lived through it, though there, is always more or less low fever-hanging about.

The rowdy men on remand had a very bad time. It was very hot, and one after the other the poor devils got this low fever, and had to be attended to. How we wish the gaol doctor could have been round for once during the many years of his tenure of office, just when the men are let out in the morning and the cell doors are opened. It would have done his delicate nasal organ good. He has been known to venture down to the drain during the day-time when the stench is at its minimum, and say -

‘H'm, dear me. How very unpleasant to be sure.’

But nothing more was ever heard of it, and nothing but the unremitting attention of the officials has pre vented frightful fevers breaking out. Of the men who died within the walls, most of the cases have been ‘senile debility,’ except where sus. per col.** has been recorded. The rowdy men, however, did not die. Having got fever, every effort was made to set them up again, and successfully.

We walls have seen much we don't pity prisoners for a bit. Take them all round they are a bad lot, but it is rather too hard to forbid them the common necessity of fresh air.’
* There are a number of journalistic accounts of this underground ‘dark cell’, but a 2006 archaeological dig at the site found no physical evidence that any such cells had existed.

** Latin
suspendaturpercollum('lethimorherbehangedbytheneck')

The Hempen Halter: Criticising the Boggo Road Gallows

$
0
0
The following article criticising the gallows used at Brisbane's Boggo Road prison appeared in the tabloid newspaper The Truth on Sunday 12 July 1903. Some very harsh words were also written about Superintendent Vivian Williams. The Truth had an editorial line that was strongly against hanging, a position that had firmed after the unpopular hanging of Patrick Kenniff six months earlier. This article contains the usual strident polemics that the reporters of the Truth specialised in, but it does give some very fascinating details about the execution process that were usually missing from reports of hangings.

Hanging of Sotulo at Boggo Road.
(The Truth, 5 July 1903)
'THE HEMPEN HALTER

Facts Concerning the Boggo-Road Gallows.
An Out-of-Date Death Machine.
A Relic of the System.
Red Tapeism and False Economy.

The illustration of the hanging of Sow Too Low, which appeared in our last issue, was intended to convey to the minds of the good people of this State the scandalously out-of-date machinery used for the execution of condemned criminals. If those who have a copy of our last issue will turn to the picture of the gallows they will better understand the drift of our criticism.

The trap upon which the condemned man stands is a heavy iron-bound and clamped wooden door which is carefully set to drop instantaneously from beneath his feet, the moment the lever is pushed forward by the alert man-butcher. It takes four or five men to set the trap, which is a most dangerous and out-of-date machine. Some of these days it will collapse and kill several of the officers who are compelled in pursuit of their duties to move about on it. We have heard several complaints about its cumbrousness.

It is customary before an execution to set the trap and go through the ceremony of hanging a dummy figure. This is done in order to ascertain that everything is in proper working order before. The condemned criminal is brought forth from his cell and led on to the trap. And, by the way, right here we think it pertinent to remark that the wretched authorities of our gaol institutions instead of learning wisdom with the passage of time, appear to be becoming actually more conservative and retrogressive.

The gallows erected in the now gaol for women at Boggo-road is precisely the same as that in 'B' wing in the men's gaol. Every fault and defect in the old scaffold has been carefully reproduced in the new structure. The cumbrous, painfully, slow method of releasing the dead body from the noose has been repeated with photographic detail; so, too, is the old silly blunder in the placement of the lever for releasing the trap: The lever is not shown in our illustration, but it is placed to the right of the drop, and instead of being pulled it is pushed. The condemned man walks up the short flight of stairs leading to the scaffold. Arrived at the top he turns abruptly to the right in order to stand upon the trap. In doing so he passes so close to the lever that if he made a sudden plunge or stumbled he could not help touching it, which resembles those in use in railway signal boxes, and springing the trap. In the event of such a contingency happening, the condemned man would have to be taken back to his cell, and the execution postponed until a half a dozen able bodied men set it once more.

This defect could be altered at a slight expense, but the pinch book policy of the Philp push* prevents this necessary amendment being made.

But the most serious defect in the arrangements for executing a criminal is the cumbrous system of lowering the body from the gallows into the coffin. After the body has hung 10 or 15 minutes, the doctor feels for the pulse and formally pronounces life extinct. The hangman meantime is standing silent and erect in a little alcove just behind the lever. As soon as the doctor has signified his verdict, the coffin is brought in from the hearse, and placed right beneath the suspended cadaver.

Vivian Williams. (Truth, 12 July 1903)
Now it is that the most painful part of a painfully gruesome function, is performed. Many people are under the impression that the rope is cut, and the body detached. This is a popular error. As soon as the gaping coffin is placed in readiness to receive the broken necked, limp clod of human clay, the hang man issues from the alcove with a light ladder on his shoulder. This he places at the edge of the gallows well-hole, the top resting against the cross beam, from which hangs the pendent rope. Simultaneously a number of warden on the floor of the third tier of cells lower a block and tackle. The man butcher carefully mounts the ladder, and connects the hook in one of the links by which the rope is fastened to the cross-beam. This having been accomplished, the warders haul upon the tackle and the swaying body gradually mounts up in a series of awkward, spasmodic jerks. The hangman then disconnects the links, and the corpse is held suspended by the warders until Hudson** descends the ladder and the flight of stairs and stands ready to receive the body whose soul he has just sent speeding to its Maker. By another series of jerks and jumps the corpse is lowered into the coffin, the undertaker seizing it by the feet and the hangman by the head. When the rope slackens he unloosens the noose and slips it from the limp neck. It is then quickly hoisted out of sight by the warders, the coffin lid is screwed on, and the box taken speedily away and hidden in a hole.

It is the crudest and most cumbrous arrangement that can well be conceived. The writer has seen a better arrangement in a backblock slaughter-house for the disposal of the carcase of a pithed bullock. Of course, it is useless to point out this fact to the powers that be. Superintendent Vivian Williams is armed with the necessary power to have the alterations suggested made, but he is one of the old order, an admirer of 'the system,' bound hand and foot with red tape, and absolutely invulnerable to the dictates of common sense or the lessons of experience. No improvement can possibly take place unless this fossil is superannuated and the position filled by a vigorous, practical man who has spent many years on the gaol staff.'

* Robert Philp was premier of Queensland 1899-1903.
** Samuel Hudson was the official executioner in Queensland at the time.



Statement from the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society (Inc.) on the Boggo Road plans

$
0
0
(I post this here as a member of the management committee of the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society.)

We note that Calile Malouf Investments have recently lodged the Development Application for their Boggo Road Gaol plans for assessment by the Brisbane City Council and the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection. This process could take a number of months.

We are pleased that the planning for the heritage pfrison is moving forward. We have long advocated that it should be transformed into a dynamic cultural hub with increased community access, and are broadly supportive of the current approach.  

Our main concern is that there needs to be sufficient emphasis on the heritage and arts components. While we welcome the inclusion of a number of quality hospitality areas within the prison grounds, we hope that Boggo Road is viewed primarily as a heritage and arts venue with great dining options, and not a dining venue with a heritage backdrop. We will now be working to ensure the right balance is struck.

We are pleased that provision has been made for museums, tours and other heritage activities, and expect to see different organisations once again working side by side in offering a wide range of visitor services. The Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society is aiming to have a major role in providing tours and services, continuing an onsite tradition going back to 1994. We are also currently working with other organisations as part of the Boggo Arts & Heritage Alliance to finalise plans for innovative and unique ways of presenting the history of Boggo Road.

There are significant structural changes planned for Boggo and we hope to see some well-informed debate around this subject. We would prefer that structural changes were minimal, but without any commitment from successive state governments to pay to maintain Boggo Road, some compromise is needed to fund the revitalisation of the site and keep it open. 

For those who are opposing the current plans, we anticipate the presentation of their alternative plan for funding the maintenance of Boggo Road through the coming decades.

We are quite happy with the level of consultation we have had with the companies involved so far, and right now we are still discussing the details of the Development Application with hundreds of members of the historical society. The plans are very detailed and there are a range of opinions on them, but we will be encouraging our members and also the public to arm themselves with the facts, have a rational discussion, make up their own minds, and have their say to the government departments currently assessing the plans for this public asset.

The Development Application can be read here.


Stephen M Gage (President, BRGHS)
Mick Kindness (Vice-president)
Chris Dawson (Secretary)

Within the Walls of Brisbane Gaol (1883): 'An Execution'

$
0
0
(Queensland Figaro, 3 February 1883)
(These articles are reproduced from the Queensland Figaro, January-February 1883, and describe aspects of life in HM Prison, Brisbane, which at that time was located at Petrie Terrace. It was written from the perspective of the walls, in an 'if these walls could talk' scenario. This particular article focussed on the execution procedure. The prison at Petrie Terrace closed in July 1883when it wassuperseded by the Boggo Road prison.)   

‘To be hung by the neck until your body be dead, and may God Almighty have mercy on your soul.’

With these words ringing in his ears the man who has wilfully taken the life of another istaken back to prison and at once conducted to the condemned cell. Here he is dressed in gaol clothes, and ironed. Who rivets the leg irons on? Well it ought to be done by a warder and generally has to be done by one, but if they can run the carpenter or any other man into it they will. It is not always easy to get the carpenter to do it. He would rather take 3 days in the dark cell than in any way assist. But whether he does it or not it is: not long before the clink, clink of the hammer tells that those rivets are being clinched which will not be broken until within a few moments of the human being on whom they are fastened being hurled into eternity.

How long will that be? He has no hope of a mitigation of the sentence. He may be a blackfellow to whom death and life are much the same; he may be a chinaman who is quite as resigned to the prospect of playing fantan in the next world as in this; or he may be a white man. With blackfellows and Chinamen we, no more than anyone else, need trouble. The blackfellow is a ‘brute’ and must be put out of the way. The Chinaman is not wanted in the country, and one less will please the people. As to the white man he has the colour of his skin on his side, and so with a month in which to do it in he has to be ‘crammed’ for eternity.  

There may be an occasional case in which the ministrations of the attendant minister are at first listened to with attention and seriousness, but in most instances the condemned man is too full of the dreadful situation in which he is placed to be able to collect his thoughts, until the last ten days. He is allowed none but religious books, but on application to the doctor he can get anything in reason he wants to eat and a certain amount of stimulant, usually brandy. Condemned men do not have very good appetites but the principle they go on, or rather their cook goes on, is ask for everything you can get and if you can't eat it I will. The diet is not very closely restricted. A man, like a bullock, ‘dies’ better if he is in good condition, and the gaol people think it reflects credit on them when a man ‘dies well.’

The closing scene, though it seems very terrible to the few outside people who are allowed in, is nothing in comparison with some of the scenes which take place prior to the fatal morning, and which never go beyond the walls. Some men have no sense of theirposition. We walls saw one man, executed who revelled in the idea of death. He was a western teamster; and refused all religious ministration. The day before he was hung he ate enormously, he made merry with everybody that came near him; he danced along the verandah when at exercise near the condemned cell so far as his irons would admit him; and throughout the night he sang all his camp fire songs, he cursed and swore, and went through his western orgies one by one and fought his fights over again, making use of awful language, but most awful as such a time. The hardest hearted man in the gaol stood aghast. He could not be stopped; it was his last night on earth and he intended to put it in as he chose. Ten minutes before he was executed he asked for a steak. Half an hour afterwards the remains of James Elsdale - the Ringtailed Rover - were in a shell on their way to the cemetery. 

Other men such as chinamen and blackfellows meet their fate with indifference. Most men are overwhelmed by their position. They neither eat nor sleep. They pace the cell and gaze vacantly through the ‘gridiron’ as they call the iron barred gate of the cell. Some men weep most copiously; a sympathetic look from a passing prisoner will start their tears afresh. But they are able generally to gain sufficient composure to carry them up to the last two or three days. Here again they are upset, for they hear the gallows being erected and as the condemned cells now stand can see the awful engine of death as they take their daily exercise of one hour in the 24.

The night before the execution they may too catch a glimpse of the common hangman who comes to stretch the rope and fasten it to the crossbeam. These things, though the authorities do their little to avoid redisturbing the condemned man's mind, can not well help escaping his notice. The hangman requires assistance to stretch the rope. Who helps him? There are sure to be a couple of blackfellows for that work. No white prisoner will do it. Let them earn a fig of tobacco and a box of matches which the hangman has to give in payment for stretching the rope while he soaps it and puts his knot in it. And he delights in the dirty work.

During an execution the other prisoners are not now allowed to be in any position where they can see what takes place; except that from the remand yard they can sometimes see the condemned man mount the scaffold to go on the drop. Ten seconds scarcely elapse between the last stair being mounted and the fall of the drop, so quick is the executioner in adjusting the cap, the rope, and drawing the bolt.

Then there is a dull weary creaking sound as the drop swings back, which is heard all over the gaol, and we know that he is gone to his last account.

It is at such a time as this that an appeal to the better feelings of prisoners might be successfully made. On the morning of an execution - indeed during the whole time of the condemned man's stay in the gaol, the sensibilities of prisoners are softened. They know that they must face death themselves some day, though most probably not in that form, and they cannot help turning the subject over in their minds. They speculate on what eternity is and a seriousness pervades them which only needs a little moral teaching at the moment to create in some cases a lasting impression. We walls don't want to say that theirs is a very fruitful soil in which to sow the seed. But there is soil of some sort, and anything which will tend towards reformation and not towards making prisoners 100 times worse on discharge than on entry might be made use of. ‘Can the leopard change his spots’ you will say? Perhaps not, but you don't know till you've tried in every case.’

Within the Walls of Brisbane Gaol (1883): 'Sunday'

$
0
0

(Queensland Figaro, 27 January 1883)
(These articles are reproduced from the Queensland Figaro, January-February 1883, and describe aspects of life in HM Prison, Brisbane, which at that time was located at Petrie Terrace. It was written from the perspective of the walls, in an 'if these walls could talk' scenario. This particular article focussed on Sundays in the prison. The Petrie Terrace prison closed in July 1883when it wassuperseded by the Boggo Road prison.

(Warning: contains language that is now considered to be racist.)

'The Sunday in this place is of all days the weariest and the dreariest. There is no work going on. The men rise at the same hour as other days. The few who are engaged in keeping the gaol clean - the sweepers and padlock polishers and such like - have done their jobs by half-past 10, or perhaps 10 o'clock. All congregate under the sheds in the yard, and hang about in little knots. Where so many men are absolutely ignorant and unable to read, or have only attained these accomplishments to the extent of their own name and reading it afterwards, which constitutes a man ‘able to read and write’ in the gaol books when there are so many of this class a good ‘pitcher’ is in high estimation. He is probably an old hand, and he starts some yarn either of his own crimes or those of other criminals, and initiates a gaping crowd of more or less youthful sinners into a few of the devices which he has found successful in evading the laws and its pursuit of him. He is heard with interest and meets with little interruption as he details how he robbed this man, and how he ill-treated that woman; how he stole so and so's horses, and where he planted them; how he met a ‘chinky’ out of the beaten track one day, and that chinaman is not likely to see the Flowery Land again though all his gold was only two ‘weights’ - these and other incidents he tells unblushingly, and with much honor and glory to himself.   

The various classes hang together. Sunday being the lazy day - no work, no parson, only to kill time - it is the great day for yarning. The horse-stealers collect together in one spot, the cardsharpers in another; the larrikins by themselves, and so on, and it applies right through, and there is more real harm done, amongst short sentence men especially, on a single Sunday; within the walls, than months of solitary confinement will wipe out. Plans are made for fresh crimes. There is nothing to occupy the mind but past misdeeds, and how to avoid getting into the hands of the law for the future, and to these two subjects the prisoners give all their attention. The interludes consist of gambling for tobacco, and sugar, and matches, and as much cursing and swearing follows the loss of an eighth of an ounce of tobacco as would, astonish the ears of people accustomed to ordinary blasphemy. 

They used to have some sort of service on the Sabbath. Why not now? Ask Douglas, and Palmer, and McIlwraith, and the rest of the Colonial Secretaries, and the answer they would give is, that gaols are not the place for religion of any kind - it does no good, what’s the use of it. They can do without it themselves. That ought to be enough. 

Are there no books? Well there are books. There are the wrecks of a few old books used when there was ‘school’ in the gaol; there are the wrecks of a few old Bibles, the leaves of Sacred Volume being chiefly in requisition for pipe lights, as there is mostly a heap of burning rubbish the yard, and the matches are reserved for the cells at night. There are a few partially destroyed novels, and that is all. The good-conduct men who have friends in the town, are often allowed books in, but these men are not much in the yards list, have billets, such as in the cook-house, or have clerical workto perform.

So Sunday drags on, and it is with a feeling of relief that locking-up time comes. The new-comer can then once more reflect on what sort of a place he has got into. He has never spent such a Sunday before. He little thought when a gambling debt first led him to touch what was not his own, that it would end in his being committed to a convict prison. The walls know what the mental anguish of some men is, who have been in good positions when they find themselves herded with men some of whom though, human beings, are but little removed from brutes, who have spent so much of their lives in gaol that to live out of it would be impossible, who would, step short of no crime to gratify the lustful passion of the moment.

On Sunday also, is a favorite day for descriptions to be taken. As soon as a man comes in he is supposed to be passed through the gaol-books, but it is as often as not left to the Sunday after his arrival for the description ‘to be filled in.’ His height, weight, complexion, &c., and any permanent marks are carefully noted. If he has been in there on a former occasion, he is just examined to see if there is any change on his previous description, and if not, H.B. meaning ‘here before’ is marked against his name. Let any visitor to the gaol cast his eyes over the description book, and the number of H.B.'s will astonish him.

Sunday in gaol. And such a Sunday. Has it never entered the head of the philanthropic that, within those walls there are some who are utterly irreclaimable; that  there are some - rough they may be - to whom an occasional word in season, spoken as they can understand it, not preached in rounded sentences or hurled at them with denunciation, will do good. The Colonial Secretary does not think so. Convicts, says he, are of the devil, and to the devil they must go. And yet a gaol-chaplain if he did no good, could not possibly do any harm. This much is certain - a man who understood the ways of prisoners a little, who could gauge their thoughts however slightly, who had a touch of nature about him, could do a vast amount of good, not alone during prison life, but afterwards. There are occasions when prisoners are more susceptible than at other times, and to one of these I will allude in the next chapter.'


Within the Walls of Brisbane Gaol, 1883: 'By the Dog'

$
0
0
(Queensland Figaro, 17 February 1883)
(These articles are reproduced from the Queensland Figaro, January-February 1883, and describe aspects of life in HM Prison, Brisbane, which at that time was located at Petrie Terrace. Most of the series was written from the perspective of the walls, in an 'if these walls could talk' scenario, but this particular article came from the imagined perspective of a prison guard dog. The prison at Petrie Terrace closed in July 1883when it wassuperseded by the Boggo Road prison. 

‘My name is Rory. I was bred within the walls, and within them I am like to die. I have a passing recollection of my sire; he too was a Rory and knew his way about among the prisoners. He taught me a lot; so too did the prisoners. There are other dogs here besides me but I'm the biggest and strongest and savagest, and can boss the crowd. That's one thing I always found the rule - the weakest goes to the wall.

I knock about amongst prisoners and hear their talk, but I chiefly affect the cookhouse what may not be first class butcher's meat; is equal to my requirements. Very comfortable, as things go, the cooks make themselves. They are well-behaved men - sort of ‘superior’ prisoners in their own estimation, but sly, sir – devilish sly.

There is a chief cook and a ‘hominy’ cook and the 'screws’ cook and a washer up. The turnkeys are called ‘screws’ because they screw out life on so little tucker. The two greatest rascals ‘inside’ are the chief cook and the screws cook. What they don't know isn't worth while for a dog to pick up, and what they can't steal (only they call it having ‘share of what's going.’) Bill Sykes, the Artful Dodger, and Charley Bates couldn't manage between them. 

The chief cook draws the gaol rations and ‘sorts’ them. The best of the meat, the best of the ‘spuds’, and the best part of everything that he gets from the ‘store’ sticks to the kitchen ribs, but I will do them the justice to say they are always ready with a pot of tea for a new-comer, and a ‘feed’ as well; or if a man is sick what they can do to help him through they do.

The screws cook, cooks the turnkeys' meals, and ‘sorts’ their tucker. He works at an American stove and is very smart at it, chiefly when it's for the kitchen. Take him all round it is to his advantage to stand well with turnkeys, and so he looks after them well enough. 

The chief cook gets up at 4 a.m. and carries on his own little games, combined with his work, until half- past 6 o'clock. There was one man I knew during the last eight years who was an ingenious sort of a cure. He was ‘in’ for selling illicit grog, but he carried the joke further and made it on the premises; fiery stuff that made your head reel it was, but these spirits are not allowed on the premises, and the smell of a brandy bottle is reckoned high. He was a mean man and when he was going out destroyed the apparatus so that nobody else should have his head reel. He slung some hot water at me one day, and I tried to get him found out by going down mornings to the kitchen - when he was at it and howling so as to bring the warder round but he was so cool and had the whole thing so neatly set up that he'd stand talking to the turnkey for half-an-hour with the grog brewing under his nose all the time.

I have been in the yards where the ‘old man’ grows all his vegetables - peas and beans and carrots and cauliflower and that sort of tuck - and I've seen the screws' cook come hurrying along like greased lightning and he'd get back to the kitchen the wag of a tail chock-full of green stuff, legs of his trousers and all. Smart boy he was, rough as bean-straw, but with a grand heart and always looked after me. No wonder the soil within the walls bears an indifferent reputation for effective productiveness.

The chief cook has to attend to the Doctor. It is no odds if he has to leave cutting up the rations to dress a putrid sore - gives him a taste for dinner.

All prisoners go before the Doctor on entering the gaol. In spite of many years’ experience of prisoners the good old gentleman is more than occasionally imposed on. There are men who never go near him except they are obliged by real debility or sickness, and when they do he looks on them with suspicion whereas a talkative ‘gammoner’ will very likely get better ration than is his due, if he only asks it in a sufficiently persuasive way. As to medicine the unfailing remedy is castor oil, salts, ‘calomel, jalap, and gingers.’ And the usual, complaints are of two or three classes only. Want of appetite is not one of them.

Prisoners are not worth much medical attendance, and they are such awful humbugs as to their ailments, that it is no wonder the doctors refuse to believe any. I know a man who went before the medico once in the two years he was within the walls, when from sheer, weakness he could scarcely crawl about, and he got a dose of aperient medicine to cure it which he carefully administered to me in a piece of raw meat and it suited my complaint to a nicety.
  
I am not very much interested now with what they do inside the cookhouse. I cruise round at night and catch rats, but sometimes during the day I make a tour of the yards. I used to see a deal of bullying and petty tyranny, and I hear as much bad language as ever, but since they took away the workshops and sent all the prisoners away too things are very quiet and nobody don't seem to care. But there were times when they cared. They gave me 60 days solitary once for biting another dog. It wouldn't have mattered if it had been a prisoner.

If I was a bit younger I should be full up of gaol, but I'm an ‘old hand’ now and used to it. There was a time when a swim in the cool water would have done me good and I should have enjoyed it, but they took to sending me to the butcher's shop with a kit for meat, and I had to fight so many other dogs doing it I gave it best and am satisfied to stop inside.

There I can study human nature as I bask in the sun. I can see from month to month and year to year the constant repetition of the old, old story of careers and crime; from what little they began; how a second offence follows on the expiration of the first, until at last I see the old grey bearded man, with slouching gait and bag under his arm, come shuffling in and then I know that next morning another human being will have been sent to render his account to his Creator.

There I can lie with my head resting on the bars of the great iron gates and see the pitiful interviews which take place between visitors and prisoners - the wife in the agony of her faithfulness; the mother in the agony of her tenderness; the shaken, broken voice of father, brother, nay even of a son. I can see, as I did once, a cab drive up to the outer gate and a pale, emaciated woman lifted out and carried into the office, too weak to stand, too weak to move without help - at death's door. And this last effort she made to see a prisoner - her husband. God alone knows what her agony of mind must have been to break her heart and her health thus. None was present at that interview but me. I never wish to see or hear of another like it. The poor, broken-hearted wife gasped but few words - the yearning of her soul towards him who had wrecked her life was too great for utterance. And he, though he once was called a gentleman, met her with inhuman savageness. A scream brought the warder on duty to the room. The prisoner was re moved. The last words were never said, and a few days later she was a corpse. But, did that man care? Pah! Such men as these are brutes. Terrible scenes are these - many as I have seen of them. But who shall say they are not wisely ordained?

And what brings men within the walls? The two grand passions of avarice and drink. Search the records of the prisoners and their previous careers. What do their crimes spring from? Passions naturally, but which could be easily overcome, influenced by drink. Cold-blooded crime is rare. Is it any use to warn, to add one more word to the thousands already written on the subject? It may not be, but I would fain add one line of warning, especially to those whose life is all before them, and who may by a very little effort now withdraw themselves from the edge of that whirlpool whose current will inevitably drag them down to ruin and disgrace. For as surely as they are weak-minded enough to allow themselves to be drawn into the first little slip so surely will the descent from day to day become easier until they are suddenly face to face with the fact that the strong hand of the law is upon them, and that they are within the walls and on that follows months or years of anguish to themselves and all connected with them, which the rest of a lifetime will never efface.’

Unauthorised Activities in Brisbane Cemeteries?

$
0
0

Here we go again...

On page 7 of today’s City South News, local ‘ghost tour’ operator Cameron ‘Jack’ Sim again attacks a local history group, this time for having the audacity to run a single one-off cemetery tour raising money for cemetery heritage projects.

The cause of this episode was a not-for-profit ‘Halloween Tour’ organised and run by Moonlight Tour volunteer guides Tracey Olivieri and Liam Baker at the South Brisbane Cemetery a few weeks back.Mr Sim’s claims that the tours were unlicensed and that the Brisbane City Council should be ‘throwing the book’ at the volunteers. As the article reads, ‘Mr Sim… said Council had always required operators to have a current license’. In other words, he sees the tours as being unauthorised.

First of all, the truth is that the Moonlight Tour organisers had written permission from the Brisbane City Council to run this one-off special fundraising event. I did not organise or attend this tour (I'm not a Halloween fan) but I did behave like a pain in the backside ensuring they had permission for it, and I have seen that written permission. Also, discussions are still underway between the council and the Friends of South Brisbane Cemetery about a whole new licensing system for these kinds of activities in cemeteries. So, no big deal.

As for the claim that such tours having ‘always required’ a license, this is false. The license system for night tours only came into effect circa 2010, thanks to the efforts of the FOSBC. Prior to that time, the cemeteries department had little idea what business Mr Sim was carrying out in their cemeteries, and he didn’t pay a cent for it. This included birthday parties, dress-up Halloween tours, pseudo-occult rituals as part of the tours, and ‘ghost hunts’. All without any form of license.

The FOSBC are unaware if Mr Sim had permission for these activities - we doubt it - but it is worth noting that after the license system was introduced and Mr Sim had to start paying to use the cemeteries, the Brisbane City Council banned those birthday parties, fancy-dress tours, pseudo-occult rituals and ‘ghost hunts’, and any other ‘disrespectful’ activities.  Even after the license system supposedly banned much of these activities, Mr Sim started advertising ‘hen’s night’ tours in the cemetery. 

Remember, this is in a cemetery that the Brisbane City Council still uses and charges people thousands of dollars to provide a special resting place for their loved ones.

In my opinion, the council should have a duty of care to ensure that after you have paid a lot of money to lay a loved one to rest in one of the cemeteries, the grave won’t be overrun with party-goers, ghost hunters or occult ritual performances - especially when conducted in pursuit of private profit. To their credit, in recent years the BCC have tried to stop such activities in their cemeteries. Unfortunately, it seems that the occult rituals of holding hands in a circle and chanting to summon the ’Angel of Death’ still happen on the Toowong Cemetery Ghost Tour, despite several warnings from the city council not to do it.

It is also worth noting that this was the only Moonlight Tour run by the volunteers in about 18 months, and there were no immediate plans for any more any time soon. Mr Sim, on the other hand, has had access to the cemetery for tours just about every week during that time. So what’s the problem?

The wider context of this complaint is that Mr Sim resents community groups who he feels form any kind of ‘competition’ to his small business. He has a long history of attacking local history groups and volunteers who he perceives to be threat, and unfortunately it seems that it doesn’t take much for Mr Sim to feel threatened. As far as South Brisbane Cemetery goes, his aggressive harassment of volunteers wanting to organise not-for-profit cemetery tours or publish not-for-profit cemetery booklets only stopped with the intervention of magistrate courts and police warnings.

In fact, when the Moonlight Tours first started in 2010 he did what he could to stop them, even though these tours are run solely to raise money for cemetery heritage projects.

Why? Well, as he is quoted as saying in the article, ‘It’s ridiculous there would be multiple ghost tour operators in Brisbane’. In other words, he is demanding a business monopoly for himself. How many other businesspeople would like that? The truth is, there is no reason there can’t be multiple ghost tour operators in town, especially as Mr Sim’s own product leaves a lot to be desired (for examples, see hereand here).  

The only ridiculous thing here is Mr Sim’s false sense of entitlement. How many small businesses get to demand a monopoly? I’d hope his business was solid enough to withstand a volunteer group conducting a one-off tour every 18 months. 

This whole storm-in-a-teacup only provides yet more evidence of Mr Sim’s antagonism towards local history groups carrying out the normal business of local history groups. In this case, a one-off not-for-profit guided tour that raised money for community heritage projects.

The outcome of all this is that after a quiet year, the FOSBC are now sitting down making new plans for 2016. 

Oh, and if the council need to be 'throwing the book' at anyone, maybe they could start by looking at those supposedly-banned occult rituals in the Toowong Cemetery tour. I'm sure they don't want to be that one city council that keeps turning a blind eye to occult rituals taking place in their municipal cemeteries.

The Case For a Boggo Road Cultural Hub

$
0
0
With the Boggo Road redevelopment process now taking another step forward with the release of the draft application details, I’d like to gradually present a few articles on this website outlining my own ideas, beginning – as we always should – with the Big Picture.

What kind of a place do I want Boggo Road to become?

I’ve been continually involved in this planning process as long as anyone, and like to think I have a decent grasp of what is possible for Boggo Road. Unfortunately what is possible is the framework we have to work within, and so my ‘perfect world’ ideas for the prison are irrelevant.

If we have learned anything from the last four Queensland premiers - Beattie, Bligh, Newman and Palaczszuk - it is that there is no government magic pudding to fund the eternal upkeep of Boggo Road. This was an ideological decision taken way back when, and nine-figure legally-binding contracts were signed with the private sector years ago so there will be no u-turns. We have to make the best of what we have now, which is a private development company leasing Boggo Road from the state government and trying to create significant revenue from reusing the site (with retail and licensed dining facilities) while providing for a decent heritage/arts precinct within the walls.     

This is not ideal (from my perspective) but the plans I’ve seen are largely palatable and the people behind them seem genuinely keen on making the heritage aspects work. This makes sense as the success of the licensed dining facilities would be partially dependent upon the rest of the site being a quality drawcard for the public.

My overall philosophy is that it would be a worthwhile achievement to take Boggo Road - an old prison ingrained with decades of negativity and pain - and transform it into a place of positive creativity and community life. In effect, to ‘rehabilitate’ the buildings themselves.
It is a place in need of healing, a scar in the psyche of the landscape. Some people recoil from it. There are some former officers and inmates who suffer Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and have psychological and physical reactions to even being near the prison. I know of one old screw who had to quit his job after he couldn’t walk through the main gates anymore, and afterwards he would urinate in his pants if he was accidentally driven past the place.

This is not a happy place, and it can’t be healed by simply filling it with diners and artists and tourists and schoolkids. We must never forget or whitewash or diminish what happened there. That would be unfair on all those who experienced it when it was a prison, and unfair on those who can still learn the important lessons of that history.

What we need to do next is use the history as inspiration for telling stories of the old prison through live performance, visual arts, oral history, exhibitions and the written word. Boggo Road should become a centre for encouraging debate and research about Boggo Road itself. A place where we invite the community in to talk about what happened there, through (as I always say) ‘many stories, through many voices, in many ways’.

Not every artistic event that takes place there needs to address that history, but it is one of those places that inevitably adds deeper layers of meaning to any performance or installation. I would like to see a binding managerial commitment to encourage an ongoing creative discourse about Boggo Road through the arts.

In this way, Boggo Road will become a truly living cultural hub, a place whose own meaning and significance is being positively transformed and challenged through an ongoing process of creative engagement with its own history.

We now have an opportunity to create something great and unique at Boggo Road. Not just another by-the-book prison museum or yuppie/hipster dining Quarter, but an award-winning, living centre of culture that draws inspiration from and engages with the profound history that is soaked into the buildings themselves. And offers some pretty fantastic dining options along the way…

Putting the philosophical aspects of a Boggo Road creative hub aside, there is also a solid commercial argument that a dynamic and varied programme of artistic and History-related events is the best way to bring in repeat customers. It has been acknowledged by both the government and the developers that the potential of Boggo Road has not been realised. The prison has been underused in recent years, and although the buildings are the main drawcard and promote themselves (so even Bill Shorten could sell tours there[i]), it is currently dead space for most of the time. People do one tour and don’t come back.

A varied menu of quality arts and heritage events will get people coming back regularly to see something new. And take in a meal while they’re there. The Boggo Arts &Heritage Alliance has the ideas, talent and connections to make this concept work.

It makes financial sense, but the idea of a thriving, living cultural hub at Boggo Road also seems like a natural fit for the old prison. Let's hope the decision-makers have the vision and energy to make this happen.



[i] This was quite obvious one Sunday in 2011 when the Boggo Road Gaol Historical Society volunteers started monthly clean-ups of the prison. The place had been closed for six years, was completely unadvertised, and yet we had about 20 curious visitors walk in that day, even though it was strictly members-only. We tried to keep people OUT and they kept coming in!

A Suffragette Recalls Boggo Road Gaol

$
0
0
Silver hunger-strike medal presented to
the Suffragette prisoner Lady
Constance Lytton, October 1909
The following article about a female prisoner recalling her time inside Boggo Road is adapted from Brisbane's Daily Standard, April 1935.

The subject isConstance Clyde, who was born in Scotland in 1872, moved to New Zealand as a child, and then on to Sydney in 1898. She wrote for the Sydney Bulletin, and penned the novel A Pagan's Love, in which ‘questions of women's dependence were raised, with the heroine considering an extra-marital relationship with a man’. As a reporter, she was imprisoned in England in 1907 as one of the suffragettes who ‘caused a disturbance’ in the House of Commons. A similar protest scene was depicted in the inspiring 2015 movie Suffragette. Clyde wrote of some her experiences as a protester in this 1907 article.

She also provided this excellent account of her time in London's Holloway Prison that year.

In 1935 she was living in Brisbane and was arrested for earning money by fortune-telling with tea-leaves. She characteristically refused to pay the fine and was sent to the Female Division at Boggo Road, which at that time was a small timber dormitory next to the main prison off Annerley Road. Upon her release she told the local Press of her time inside there:
'WOMAN TELLS OF EXPERIENCES IN BOGGO-ROAD.
Little Colony That Is Forgotten

Forgotten women in an isolated colony in the heart of Brisbane is how an elderly woman, and a remarkable personality herself, views the women's section of Boggo-road Gaol, in which she recently spent three weeks. Her offence was fortune-telling with tea-leaves, and she refused to pay the fine.

Newspaper article confirming suffragette Constance Clyde's arrest in London, 1907She is ‘Constance Clyde,’ and is well-known by that name to readers of women's periodicals in Australia. Author of a novel, contributor to high-class English reviews, sometime social editress of a Christchurch (N.Z.) newspaper, and in 1906 one of Emmeline Pankhurst's Suffragettes, she indicts Boggo-road as a bleached version of what a woman's prison should be.

Constance Clyde speaks from experience. In her own words she says that she ‘has experienced several gaols,’ but it ought to be pointed out that since early womanhood she has been something of a stormy petrel in questions affecting feminine reforms. Holloway, one of England's famous gaols, housed her for a couple of weeks, giving her her first taste of prison life.

Although born in Scotland, she was brought to New Zealand at an early age, and returned in 1906 in time to become enthusiastic in the cause of women's suffrage. Mrs. Pankhurst and her famous daughters had espoused action where talk and entreaty had failed and in a still somewhat, conservative age had decided that only by violence could Englishmen be induced to concede Englishwomen their, rightful share in each triennial failure to elect an ideal Commons.

If nowadays the 'average' woman elector votes only under the dutiful pressure of her husband, and the threat of a fine, then it can only be advanced, in extenuation, that times have changed!

Anyway, one of the milder forms of suffragette exhibitionism during 1906 was a proposed gathering of the clan in Parliament Square. The intention of the Suffragettes was to march into Parliament House, and then let Providence be their guide. Miss Clyde was one of them.

On their arrival they found the Square well picketed by policemen, and, recalls Miss Clyde, she was one of about a hundred who were arrested and sentenced to Holloway. They were regarded by their sympathisers as martyrs, and when they came out were given brooches as a memento, the color-scheme being purple and green. This, however, was a mild form of martyrdom compared with those others essayed later by individuals; a peak sensation of the campaign occurred when a suffragette threw herself down, on the race track in the path of the thundering Derby field.

Miss Clyde remembers that as first-class misdemeanants they were given butter in Holloway; they were allowed to retain small personal possessions, such as hairbrushes; they were not denied the spiritual consolation of a minister of religion. None of these advantages, she says, was obtainable In Boggo-road, though the officials were kindness itself.

‘I realise perfectly,’ she said, ‘that a gaol is not intended to be a rest home. But Boggo-road impressed me as being run on a wrong principle. For instance, we were not allowed hairbrushes, but were provided with a big comb each, with which to do our hair 'in a nice, neat bun behind,’ according to framed regulations issued in 1890.’

(Australian Town and Country Journal, 18 November 1903)

There was not even dripping on the bread, and the food supplied was of a needlessly poor quality, declared Miss Clyde.

The tone of the section was neglect and decay. ‘It is as forgotten,’ she added, 'as an Aztec temple in ancient Peru.’

‘There is no regular weekly inspection, and the doctor to most of us was a rumor. He did not see everyone on entry. No members of women’s organisations, or other organisations, come to console or uplift. Sundays were like other days, without the vestige of a service.

‘On the second of my three Sundays our religious food was one bar of music faintly wafted to us from the men's prison, where the Salvationists held a service. No Salvationist came over to call us ‘sister.’

‘On one weekly evening the men were entertained to an uplift movie. It would have been- easy, as in other prisons, to send the women over to some hidden part of the hall, but we were not sent over.

Prison Clothes.
‘There were two sorts of prison clothes - garments crisply new, and others that crept down. The socks were past redemption. I found difficulty in obtaining from a mouldy Government box a pair of the heelless prison slippers that would stay on my feet.

‘I was seriously informed that if I couldn't find a pair, on no account would I be permitted to approach my suitcase for a pair of my own. Rather must I perambulate cell, veranda and yard, which comprised our ‘run’ in stockinged soles.

‘I 'did not mind this so much - being fairly Bohemian! - but the first pair of long, white garterless socks that I received had only a half a sole to each foot.

‘Completely deprived of our personal possessions, and of crochet and sewing, and unable to write or play games, we would gladly have mended these socks for pastime. But there is only one Government needle, and no mending wool! I admit there is a sewing machine, which is used for Government work.

‘We were not there to occupy ourselves. When Government work failed we loafed around the yard or sat on our backless benches. I spent part of the third day trying to show a fellow prisoner a certain crochet stitch with a piece of stick and some string. We did nothing in our leisure except read the few tattered and ancient stories of the Victorian era, and some American publications.

Gangster Yarns.
‘After our final lock-up at half past four I sat up till lights out at eight o'clock, perusing these gangster yarns, 'My Nine Years in Hell,''How I Became a Dope Fiend,' and other stories suitable for our condition.

‘Out of the 24 leaden-footed hours we spent nearly 17 in our cells. The authorities have forgotten to put stools in the cells. The furnishings comprise a bed, hard as a brick, without wire mattress, and a locker in which to keep simple provisions. When we took in our dinner stew, served in a dog tin, we might eat it sitting on the bed, twisting round to get at our meat on the locker, or give up the struggle and sit on the floor.

‘Our breakfast and tea meal consisted of a mug of tea with dry bread. We were allowed sugar, and our supply of milk was so abundant that to this moment, freedom attained, I have given this fluid a complete miss.

‘In New Zealand the women are given dripping, and also, every week, one pot of jam of a good brand. In Holloway in Suffragette times, misdemeanants at least received butter.

‘With mild malignancy, the Queensland Government did not allow us to buy anything for ourselves. This system is a hangover from the period when prisoners were held to be reformed by semi-starvation.


Kindly Officials.
‘The officials were humane - their kindly way of speaking, so important a matter to the incarcerated, perhaps saves many from a breakdown. But they do not understand. I heard of one declaring that the 'women were happy enough in gaol.' This is not true. We were all, educated or uneducated, always miserable.

‘The glory time is when a new prisoner enters. From her comes the news - but it is always underworld news. We were not permitted to hear real world news to counteract this evil. It would corrupt us to hear that Bishop so-and-so has laid a foundation stone, or that someone rescued someone else bravely from drowning at Sandgate. Only the evil of the world is permitted to come in.

‘I learned in this gaol how to make 'pinkie,' the names of a few Brisbane gangsters, and how possibly (if I want it) I might, after some hunting, obtain cocaine.

‘An ideal gaol is one that the world remembers, and in which the prisoner forgets. But this woman's gaol is one that the community has forgotten. Only its inmates will remember it and the lessons learnt within its dilapidated walls.’

Official Reply.
When told of ‘Constance Clyde's’ statements, Mr, J. F. Whitney, Comptroller-General of Prisons, said: ‘I would be the last person in the world to claim that the women's gaol is a 1935 model, but the truth of the matter is that there are so very few female prisoners that an expensive building is not warranted.’ He added that the place was perfectly clean and very comfortable, and all the inmates were satisfied with the treatment. ‘Truth’ was taken through the women's prison, and found conditions to be as the superintendent had stated. At present there are five inmates, and all were happily sewing and chatting together.

The building was scrupulously clean; there were five blankets on each bed, and the uniforms worn by the prisoners were neat and clean. Each prisoner, ‘Truth’ was told, is in her cell from 4.30 p.m. till 6.30 a.m. next morning - 14 hours. Visitors are allowed to see inmates frequently, and ‘Constance Clyde,’ the visitors' book showed, had two visitors in three days. A study of the reading matter allowed, revealed no gangster stories.' 

Constance Clyde of Dutton Park: Author and Suffragette

$
0
0
Constance Clyde, 1903.
In August 1951 a 79-year-old Brisbane woman died and was buried in the Hemmant Cemetery. No headstone marks her grave, no newspaper obituary marked her passing, and her life in Brisbane had been generally unremarkable. Yet Constance Jane McAdam had done much to be remembered for.

I first came across Constance while researching the Brisbane Women’s Prison of the 1930s. She had spent three weeks in Boggo Road in 1935 after being convicted of ‘pretending to tell fortunes for payment’, and subsequently wrote a newspaper article about her experiences there. From that article, the breadcrumb trail of online information revealed a formidably independent woman who had been a writer in New Zealand, Sydney and London, producing a novel and numerous short stories for newspapers and magazines. In London 1907 she spent time in Holloway Prison for her part in a Suffragette protest at the Houses of Parliament. She even managed to get herself ejected from the New Zealand parliament after a one-person protest there. Clearly this was someone who lived a lifeworth recalling.

That life began in Glasgow, Scotland, in 1872 when she was born as the 11th child of William and Mary Couper. The family emigrated to Dunedin, New Zealand, in 1879. She began her literary career as a young woman writing poetry for the Otago Witnessnewspaper, and her first paid piece was a short story in the Dunedin Star. She moved to Sydney in 1898, where a major part of her journalistic career was spent writing for the Sydney Bulletin, particularly on the subjects of ‘social, feminist and literary questions’.[1]She wrote under the pen name ‘Constance Clyde’, no doubt a sentimental reference to the river than ran through the city of her birth. She also joined the ‘Yorick Club’, a somewhat bohemian collection of people with ‘a professional interest in literature, visual arts or science’.

Constance moved to London in 1903 to further her career, and her only novel, A Pagan's Love, was published there in 1905. Lawrence Jones provides this analysis of the book:
‘Clyde is explicitly contemptuous of Puritanism, which she dismisses as ‘this coarse, church-belled heathenism’. She sees it as a narrow, barren, blinkered creed suitable for the respectable conformists who live in the Presbyterian Otago community of Waihoa. The attractive alternative offering deliverance from this stultifying religion is paganism. For Clyde, this is a blend of atheism, sexual equality and a new morality. The novel charts the progression of the heroine, Dorothea Wylding, away from Puritanism towards paganism. Growing up in Waihoa, Dorothea is imbued with a strict sense of morality and a belief in respectability. This begins to be undermined when she travels to Sydney, the ‘laughing pagan city’. Here she meets the feminist Ascot Wingfield, an independent career woman and solo mother, who teaches Dorothea of the need for women to have both an intellectual and an emotional life. Dorothea is also reunited with childhood friend Edward Rallingshaw, the pagan of the title. A married man, he tries to persuade Dorothea to live with him in a free love union. Just as he wears the last of her resistance down he dies in a fire. While this at first appears to reinforce the Puritan theological code of transgression and punishment, it eventually results in the defeat of orthodoxy. Returning to Waihoa, Dorothea marries the Rev John Archieson. When she leaves him to return to Sydney he in turn discovers that the Puritan code is limiting. In a final sermon he questions whether ‘there is such a thing as sin’ and declares that ‘it is not the higher but the broader life that we want; we need our minds enlarged rather than our souls purified’. John’s heterodoxy reunites him with Dorothea. The ex-Puritan hero and heroine resolve to work together to free others from the religious and moral bondage they have experienced and to promote ‘a new morality and religion of love rather than law, of fulfillment rather than denial.’[2]
The novel did not find a large audience and I don’t know if Constance ever tried to write another one. Certainly after this time her output was largely confined to short stories for various newspapers, with the occasional piece of journalism, although in 1933 she co-authored a travel/history book titled New Zealand, Country and People.

A young suffragette is arrested at the March 1907 protest.
A young Suffragette is arrested at the
March 1907 protest.
Her political beliefs saw her make the news in 1907. Constance was naturally drawn to the cause of the Suffragettes and their long struggle for full voting rights for women. This led to her arrest and imprisonment in March 1907 for taking part of the first Suffragette protest outside the British parliament– which followed the defeat of another suffrage Bill - in which there was reported to be prolonged fighting between the protesters and the 500 police who were defending the House of Commons. 75 women were arrested that day. Constance wrote vivid newspaper accounts of these experiences, which I will reproduce in the next article on this website. I am unsure as to the direct and ongoing extent of her involvement in the Suffragette movement, and it is clear from her articles that she set out to get arrested just so she could report from inside the 'belly of the beast', but her writings show that she was clearly a very strong supporter of the struggle. Her actions also show that she was not afraid to see the inside of a prison cell, and like many Suffragettes she wore imprisonment as a badge of honour.

Her life in Edwardian London seemed to become much quieter after this time, and in 1912 it was reported that she ‘was recently received into the Church by the Jesuit Fathers at Farm street, London.’ On the face of it, this appeared to be a surprising move for a person who had railed against the establishment and conformity for so long, but Constance lost none of her political combativeness.

Her short stories continued to appear various publications in the following years, but any dreams of literary stardom in London must have faded away. She returned to New Zealand - probably during the 1920s - and continued her love/hate relationship with that country. She was admonished in the pages of the Coffs Harbor Advocatein 1925 - with the suggestion that her ankles should be caned - for her article in the Empire Review criticising the people of New Zealand for their general submissiveness. Then, in 1931, Constance was making news again with another parliamentary protest. This time her concern was child abuse, while the New Zealand parliament was considering a Child Welfare Bill.
‘When the Speaker of the House of Representatives was reading prayers this afternoon a woman in the visitors' gallery suddenly and loudly protested against the Child Welfare Act. An attendant persuaded her to remain silent, but when prayers had concluded she recommenced her protest. She tore up a copy of the Act, throwing it to the floor of the House, She was ejected by the police.

T
he woman stated subsequently that her name was Constance McAdam, and her pen name Constance Clyde. She said she was a member of the Women's International League of Peace and Freedom, and had not been aware that the House opened with prayer. "At all events, I am the first woman to speak in the New Zealand Parliament," she added.’ (Sydney Morning Herald, 19 March 1931).
Another short insight into her political and social activities was provided by a Brisbane newspaper in 1932:
‘Prominent among New Zealand writers is Constance McAdam Clyde. Articles written by her have appeared in the best English magazines, including the Contemporary and Empire Reviews. Her last publication is a history of New Zealand, in which she collaborated with Alan Mulgan, and which was brought out by Whitcombe and Tombs. Some of her most valuable work has been achieved, however, in assisting to place new writers before the public. Miss Clyde is an ardent advocate of physical culture for both the youthful and middle-aged. She is also, prominent in anti-vivisection matters.’ (Telegraph [Brisbane], 25 June 1932).
It was around this time that she moved to Brisbane and settled in the suburb of Dutton Park. This was the time of the Great Depression, and Constance was by now advertising her services in assisting with the preparation and publication of manuscripts, and she also sought a writing partner. However, in June 1933 she was living at ‘Lavinia’, on Dutton Street, Dutton Park, and subtly advertising her services as a fortune teller.

Constance also became a writer of regular letters-to-the-editor, usually under her birth name and espousing her views on various subjects. In 1933 she wrote about child protection, prison reform, her opposition to the forced sterilisation of ‘mental deficients’ (which she also wrote about in 1934). She also suggested that people should wear ‘a small piece of pale green ribbon’ on Sundays to show their support for ‘a better state of things financial’.

She continued telling fortunes under the name ‘Madame Lavinia’, and in 1935 (while living on Merton Road) she was arrested and charged with ‘having pretended to tell fortunes for a fee’. Constance faced the police and the court with characteristic defiance:
'She told me that she only did it as a sideline,' said Constable Davissen, of the Traffic Office. She said that she was a journalist, writing for 'Women's Weekly, 'Women's Budget,'‘The Women's Mirror’ and several other papers. And before I left she said, 'You can tell the magistrate from me that I will not pay any fine, even if it's only sixpence.’ (The Truth, 7 April 1935)
She told the court that 'I thought that I could do some good in this depression by sympathy, kindness and advice, and especially by telling people that there is nothing wrong with this world except the monetary system.' For Constance, even reading tea leaves could become a political platform.

Constance McAdam, 1935.
True to her word, she refused to pay the fine and so was confined inside the nearby Boggo Road prison for three weeks. She didn’t miss the opportunity to write about this experience, and I have already covered that work in this article.

This proved to be Constance’s last brush with the law. Her newspaper letters now became infrequent and her concerns trivial. In a letter to the Women’s Weekly in 1935 she complained of children getting Christmas presents too early. In 1938 she was unhappy with the etiquette of people listening to household radios, and in 1939 she complained of an accident hotspot on Ipswich Road. In 1940, now aged 68 years, she suggested that the government could save money on pensions by asking rich families to help provide for their elderly relatives. In 1944 a rather insipid poem on the tragedies of love appeared in the Queensland Times. And then, nothing. This must have all felt like a long way from the dreams of the ambitious young writer who travelled by ship from Sydney to London in 1903 with an unpublished novel under her arm.

In the 1949 Queensland Electoral Roll she was listed as a journalist and living at 15 Deighton Road, South Brisbane.

Constance died in Brisbane on 30 August 1951, and was buried in the Hemmant Cemetery. The event passed without mention in the local newspapers. There was no obituary, no funeral notice. It was a quiet end to a life that had petered out in the mundane concerns of suburbia after such an ambitious foray into the bohemian literary circles of turn-of-the-century Sydney and London. Hopefully this article will help make more people aware of the achievements of Constance Jane 'Clyde' McAdam.

Note: 
I set out here to put together the most complete online account of Constance McAdam’s life. While that general aim has been achieved, my research has been limited and holes remain. I would appreciate any further biographical information that can be added above.

List of the published writings of Constance McAdam (work in progress).
  • Consolation - Song Words, poetry (The Bulletin, 12 December 1896)
  • Hypnotised, short story (The Bulletin, 9 January 1897)
  • Dead, poetry (The Bulletin, 31 July 1897; 11 January 1933)
  • To Save His Soul, short story (The Bulletin, 26 June 1897)
  • A Woman's Promise, short story (The Queenslander, 11 December 1897)
  • Mrs Murgan's Snake Bite Cure, short story (The Sydney Mail, 17 December 1898)
  • Letters from the Grave, short story (The Queenslander, 17 December 1898)
  • Dreams and Shadows, poetry (The Bulletin, 24 December 1898)
  • A Woman's Love, short story (The Bulletin, 7 January 1899)
  • Virgins, Wise and Foolish, poetry (The Bulletin, 28 January 1899)
  • The Widow, poetry (The Bulletin, 11 February 1899)
  • Night's Day, poetry (The Bulletin, 11 February 1899)
  • A Glass of Beer, poetry humour (The Bulletin, 1 July 1899)
  • A Boarding-House Idyl, short story humour (The Bulletin, 29 July 1899)
  • The Test of Love, poetry (The Bulletin, 2 September 1899)
  • Conversely!, short story (The Bulletin, 4 November 1899)
  • The Saddest Song, poetry (The Bulletin, 9 December 1899)
  • The Soul of David King, short story (The Bulletin, 9 December 1899)
  • The Dream Child, poetry (The Bulletin, 23 December 1899)
  • The Elopement of Lydia, poetry humour (The Bulletin, 6 January 1900)
  • In the Night, poetry humour (The Bulletin, 20 January 1900)
  • Love's Climax, poetry (The Bulletin, 24 February 1900)
  • Why They Killed Mrs Saville, short story (The Australasian, 10 March 1900)
  • For Ever, poetry (The Bulletin, 28 April 1900)
  • Mrs Flynn's Sofy, short story humour (The Bulletin, 5 May 1900)
  • Jones, the Genius Hunter, poetry humour (The Bulletin, 26 May 1900)
  • The Cleverness of Douglas Fitzgerald, short story (The Australasian, 2 June 1900)
  • Angela, the Good, short story (The Bulletin, 23 June 1900)
  • Millar's Water, short story (The Australasian, 7 July 1900)
  • The Broken Dove, poetry (The Bulletin, 28 July 1900)
  • Stepmother Bessie, short story (The Australasian, 11 August 1900)
  • The Man that Came Back, short story humour (The Bulletin, 25 August 1900)
  • A Faithful Woman, poetry humour (The Bulletin, 8 September 1900)
  • The Ballad of John Bigley, poetry (The Bulletin, 20 October 1900)
  • Parson King's Happy Day, short story humour (The Bulletin, 3 November 1900)
  • Sympathetic Miss Swanston, short story (The Australasian, 29 December 1900)
  • Pirates, short story (The Bulletin, 29 December 1900)
  • My Best Friend, short story (The Australasian, 29 June 1901)
  • Her Good Father, short story (The Newsletter, 28 December 1901)
  • Pan of the Seashore, poetry (The Australasian, 6 April 1901) 
  • Mr. Shannon's Choice, short story (The Australasian, 19 October 1901)
  • The Chief Mourner, short story (The Australasian, 16 November 1901)
  • The Forgiveness of Florence, short story (The Australasian, 14 June 1902)
  • The Game Eileen Played, short story (The Australasian, 5 July 1902).
  • An Appeal, poetry (The Bulletin, 19 July 1902)
  • Mabel's Love Letter, short story (The Australasian, 20 September 1902)
  • Lizzie's Lie, short story (The Australasian, 15 November 1902)
  • The Ballad of John Ibbetson, poetry (The Bulletin, 21 February 1903)
  • A Men's Refuge, short story (The Bulletin, 21 March 1903)
  • The Diplomacy of Caroline, short story (The Bulletin, 16 May 1903)
  • The Question of Beer, poetry (The Bulletin, 23 May 1903)
  • The Enfranchised Woman, prose (The Bulletin, 20 June 1903)
  • The Difference, poetry (The Bulletin, 27 June 1903)
  • An Exemplary Mother, short story (The Australasian, 22 August 1903)
  • The Marrying of Mr. Maxwell, short story (The Australasian, 24 October 1903)
  • The Commonplace Men, poetry (The Australian Town and Country Journal, 9 December 1903)
  • A Pilgrim of Love, short story (Colac Herald, 16 September1904)
  • His Strange Little Lady, short story (The Australasian, 26 March 1904)
  • The Tragedy of the Spun-Silk Shawl, short story (The Australasian, 28 May 1904)
  • Held Cheap, short story (The Australasian, 9 July 1904)
  • The Ordeal of Mrs Holmes, short story (The Australasian, 26 November 1904)
  • A Pagan's Love, novel (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1905)
  • The Career of Jessica, short story (The Australian Town and Country Journal, 26 February 1908)
  • The Plan of Elise Blanc, short story (The Australasian, 13 March 1915)
  • The Pardoning of Jessie, short story (The Australasian, 11 March 1916)
  • Soldier’s Wives, short story (The Australasian, 23 March1918)
  • The Flippancy of Felicia, short story (The Australasian, 3 September 1921)
  • It's a Young Country Yet, short story (The Australasian, 28 January 1922)
  • When the Dumb Spoke, short story (The Australasian, 11 February 1922)
  • The Eyes of John Denne short story (The Bulletin, 27 January 1927)
  • The Motor-Car Wife, short story (The Australian Woman's Mirror, 27 September 1927)
  • Elimination, short story (The Australian Woman's Mirror, 3 January 1928)
  • 'With Shop Attached', short story (The Australian Woman's Mirror, 14 February 1928)
  • The Magic Dress, short story (The Australian Woman's Mirror, 12 August 1930)
  • Change of Heart, short story (The Queenslander, 21 March 1935) 
  • Contrasts, poetry (Queensland Times, 3 March 1944) 

[1]Kirstine Moffat, ‘The Puritan paradox: an annotated bibliography of Puritan and anti-Puritan New Zealand fiction, 1860-1940. Part 2: reactions against Puritanism’, Kotare: New Zealand Notes &Queries, Vol.3, No.2, 2000.
[2]Lawrence Jones, ‘Puritanism’, The Oxford Companion to New Zealand Literature, ed. Roger Robinson and Nelson Wattie, Melbourne, Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1998, p.130.



A Brisbane Suffragette in London

$
0
0
I recently published an article looking at the life of Constance Jane McAdam (1872-1951), an author who wrote as 'Constance Clyde' and who resided in Brisbane during the later years of her life.She spent a few weeks in the women’s prison at Boggo Road in 1935 after being convicted of ‘pretending to tell fortunes for payment’, but this was not her first time inside a prison cell. As a journalist living in London in the 1900s, she had participated in a major demonstration by Suffragettes outside the House of Commons, and was (deliberately) arrested for her troubles. She subsequently wrote two highly interesting newspaper articles on her experiences at the protest and inside prison, both of which are reproduced below.

The struggle for equal voting rights in Britain had gone on for decades, mostly by peaceful means, but by the 1900s the activist women were gettingfrustrated and turned to direct action. Their first demonstration directly outside parliament took place on 22 March 1907
after a Private Member's Bill to give (some) women the vote was defeated. Prime Minister Henry Campbell-Bannerman voted in favour of the Bill, but he allowed his MPs a free vote. The subsequent failure sparked a large protest outside the House of Commons, which was defended by 500 policemen. There was a prolonged and sometimes violent face-off that resulted in the arrest of 75 of the women.

Constance 'Clyde' McAdam was among those women. She had been born in Scotland, raised in New Zealand, and worked in Australia as a journalist before moving to London to further her literary career. A fiercely independent woman, she set out to get arrested that day so she could provide an insider's account of the protest and the conditions inside prison for the Suffragettes. The result is a fascinating record of those tumultuous days:

Through London with the Suffrage Procession.
(By Constance Clyde.)

Royalty excepted, London has raised but one statue to a woman; that woman be it noted, was a fighter. Opposite Parliament House stands that stone embodiment - Boadicea in full career. Is it not, perhaps, both an emblem and a prophecy? In the streets that surround it there was fought two nights ago a woman's battle, purely physical, for the fight to vote; ladies struggle with policeman; constables in that hysteria to which this class of men are liable, hustled and arrested innocent people - who did not even know that a suffrage riot was in progress! The papers have given but a mild account of the trampling and confusion that led to the arrest of fifty seven suffragettes on that historic evening, when some hundreds of women marched from Exeter-hall to present their petition to Parliament.

The authorised procession that took place the Saturday previous, however, has its own interest, though - a strange omission nowadays - the proceedings did not close with a string of ladies going to gaol. It is the custom of the suffragettes to give an occasional peaceful demonstration in order to show that their violence is of malice prepense, and not innate. On such occasions there come forward the gentler spirits, who, not caring to share in the aggressive methods yet wish to evince their sympathy whenever they can. For without exaggeration, sympathy is the general sentiment of English womanhood towards these twentieth century Boadiceas. That so many of such sympathisers are well to do middle-class women is, perhaps, the best omen for future success. One is not astonished that Lady Frances Balfour, and Lady Strachay rode in the procession, or that the Countess of Carlisle's daughter walked shoulder to shoulder with mill girls carrying a flag. Those women are accustomed to publicity, are conscious that their position permits unconventionality. It is when we see timid burgeois daughters, prim teachers, staid middleclass wives in the ranks that we think enfranchisement may be really at hand. ‘Club secretaries and leading literary lights walked in the procession,' said the 'Evening Standard’… and went on to wonder in somewhat 'servant gal' language 'how they could so 'demean' themselves.

The first few minutes of procession walking are certainly a little trying. The present writer slipped in a little beyond Hyde Park, and for sixty seconds' after felt that the eyes of all London were upon her. Then the newcomer takes courage, raises the head, talks to her neighbor, and glances at the mottoes on the various pink and blue banners - the gentle 'For Hearth and Home,' the more warlike 'We Demand Our Rights,' the insistent 'We ask not Indirect but Direct Influence.' A little later one glances past the file of policemen walking beside us to the crowds that line the footpath. Remarks reach our ears as we step forward.

It is difficult to gauge the London expression. There is generally the dawn of a grin; one sees only the dawn because by the time the smile is fullgrown we are level with the commencement of others further ahead. Sometimes when there is a stoppage, however, one will note a look of surprise as the masculine glance perceives so long a line of walkers - three thousand strong. Comments are frequent, and sometimes free. 'Go home and do housework' was a favourite admonition; it was heard first at Hyde Park, and met us again as we turned down Pall-Mall; later it cropped up once more by Trafalgar-square. 'What is England coming to?' was the disgusted observation of one 'Johnny,' who certainly gave the impression that England would not do much if it stopped at him. Well-known women come in for special comment. Miss Constance Smedley leans from her carriage to give an importunate beggar. 'Here, don't go wasting more of your dad's money,' called a loafer, in allusion to the princely Lyceum Club, organised by this little lady from her father's wealth. The policemen who walk beside us as guards do not know 'whether, to be proud' or ashamed of their position; nor are they quite certain how far to go in order to shield us from the impertinences of the onlookers. 'You musn't point at the ladies, but you can make remarks' is one constable's interpretation of his duties. So the rude; finger is put down, while the more or less rude tongue continues its criticisms.

Nevertheless, the onlookers on the whole are not-inimical; here and there, indeed, is raised a cheer, and the words ‘Good luck to you, ladies,' hearten our spirits. As we pass Pall-Mall there is, I must admit, a little inward shamefacedness. These interested faces at the men's club windows are known to some of us; we have dined with this one, or gone to the theatre with that. We move on, however consoling ourselves with the reflection that we are braver than Cleopatra; she died rather than walk in a precession; we should die rather than not do so! 

'Suffragettes Storm the House - Desperate Encounter With the Police - Wholesale Arrests':
The front page of the Daily Mirror after the protests of March 1907.

So we get to Trafalgar-square at last, and Exeter-hall looms in sight; Boys are running about selling a Woman's paper. We are presented with pamphlets telling us to keep on our course; other pamphlets warning us of the horror in store tor us if we do. Portraits of leading suffragettes are handed about among the crowds, while the throng grows thicker, and the traffic ahead of us is stopped. 'Not often London has to give way to women,' says the processionists with glee; and then, guarded by policemen, we enter Exeter-hall, where Zangwill and Keir Hardie and other notabilities encourage us, while an overflow meeting finds inspiration at Nelson's statue.

Such was the peaceful procession. A few days later occurred the almost terrible contest between Caxton-hall and Parliament House, this being also necessary for the cause in the opinion of the suffragettes. As a consequence, today not only mill hands but women of good family find themselves in gaol; women such as Mrs. Despard, the sister of Colonel French, left alone by the police in previous riots because of her great popularity. Women who did not even know a suffrage revolt was in progress found themselves to their astonishment taken up for asking: an innocent question, This was the fate of a girl reporter who was in the precincts of the House on merely journalistic business. Similar to her doom was that which befell a shy little novelist who three days before complained that life was dull and bereft of excitement. She had no reason to complain now. She obeyed the historic injunction to 'ask a policeman,' and having refused to pay the magisterial fine is now in Holloway. That now fashionable residence also contains a member of a leading literary club, while at another such club a day later the debate fell through because the proposer was in durance. Under such circumstances, no suffragette now attends a meeting without first making all necessary arrangements should a fortnight's involuntary absence from home result.'(Gympie Times, 30 March 1907)

The following article is Constance's account of conditions inside Holloway Gaol: 

In Holloway Gaol. A Suffragette's Life.
When I saw the startling notice "Fifty seven Suffragettes Arrested," writes Constance Clyde in the Sydney "Daily Telegraph," my resolve was taken to be one of the next batch who thus showed their desire for the franchise. Several motives influenced me; first, it was my only chance of getting into gaol respectably; secondly, I wished to show my admiration for those brave women who chose this method of warfare at a time when all England was against them. Nevertheless, I confess to a certain nervousness when I stood in Caxton-hall listening to Mrs. Despond (sister of Colonel French) inciting the women to attack the House of Commons. My nervousness increased when I followed close after Viscountess Barberton, as she swept out of the hall bearing the petition. It is difficult for an amateur to get arrested in the daytime, so, after sauntering round Westminster viewing the scene, I went back to Caxton-hall for tea and advice.

Here I learned the right mode of procedure. The best way to get into the clutches of the law is to try and get another woman out of them. The experienced suffragette leads the way, pushing and remonstrating till seized; the "amateur" catches her arm, saying, "Let go my friend" (in reality they may never have met till that moment). Robert, exasperated, then takes her in tow also. A knot of policemen forthwith rush down to prevent an escape, and follow along till called to frustrate some other attempt to enter Parliament by another entrance. By obeying those directions I duly found myself, towards the dusk of that spring evening, in the desired grip of the law, and marched to the adjacent Police Court, was cheered by a cup of tea, and a yellow paper, which affirmed that Constance Clyde had behaved riotously and obstructed the police in the execution of their duty.

Holloway Gaol, London, 1896.

Bailed out by Mr. Pethick Laurence, the well-known husband of one suffragist, the arrested one has a night in which to prepare for her fortnight's incarceration. Appearing at the Police Court at 10 next day, I found an interesting scene. First we assembled in a large room; thence, as our names were called, we moved out into a sunny yard. Here we waited for seven hours, with only one bench between us, while one by one we were called into court. We beguiled the time by consuming the refreshments sent us by the Women's Social and Political Union, and discussing the women's problem with our captors. Most of the policemen expressed themselves in favour of the suffrage. One seemed hurt at criticisms on their manner of arresting ladies, and explained that this was due to the fact that at raid time extra constables were called in who, belonging to the East End, did not yet know the West End method of going through this duly. "Did you see any roughness?" he asked anxiously. I cheered him up by affirming that it was the best-conducted riot I had ever witnessed…

In due time I appeared in court, pleaded guilty to having obstructed the police, and, having refused to pay the fine, was escorted upstairs and placed with my fellow-captives now behind a grating… About 5 p.m. we came down in batches of 12 or so to enter our respective Black Marias, on the steps of which we said good-bye to our friends in blue, and also to the crowd of small boys. Maria is not so black as she is painted, and the ride to Holloway was not the stuffy abomination I had expected. Unpleasant to the degree of misery, however, was our first evening in Holloway "Castle." During the night previous not one of us had slept, and one day in the court had been physically tiring. Now, from 6 till 9, we were locked up, three in each reception cell, with but one seat between us. Venturing to sit on the floor, we found grave objections to this proceeding, and, ringing for the wardress, produced the corpses of the slain. We were then removed into another cell, without any stool at all, and not daring to sit down on the floor, remained standing and walking for four hours longer. At last we were called out again to visit doctor, weighing machine, and bathroom, after which, clad in our loose prison clothes, we clumped in our heavy Holloway boots to a gallery, where each was locked into her cell. These compartments proved to be absolutely clean. Having ascertained this, I got down my legless plank bed, strewed mattress sheets, and blankets upon it, and heard the clock strike 2 as I went to sleep. At half-past 5 I was awakened by the rising bell sounding from far below.

A Day's Food and Work.
The first day in Holloway was most unpleasant; very few of us but complained afterwards of the harsh manners of the wardresses. Our advent, of course, throws much extra work on their shoulders, and as a result they would fling open our doors, shout something at us, and talk to us like naughty children because we did not understand. The day's procedure, once we knew it, was simple. At half-past 5 we rise, and, having washed in a tin basin, fold our bedding in a certain cart-wheel shape, and place it on the lower of two shelves. Then we attack the tin basin, dustpan, and jug with bathbrick and soap. This is the most unpleasant of our duties; we consider that, as we have not been sentenced to hard labour, our work should not be made difficult for us. Now, every housekeeper knows how much easier it is to keep clean enamelled ware than anything made of tin. At 7 we came out to fill our water-jugs, and, returning, place on the lodge tables near the door huge mugs, in which we receive in the morning nondescript tea, in the evening thin cocoa. Each time we receive also a roll of excellent wholemeal bread and butter; the latter, however, is an innovation, and was not enjoyed by the first batch of suffragettes.

Locked in again, we sweep the concrete floor with a handleless broom, and, later, receive into our cells a pail, mop, and brush, with which, every morning, save Sunday, we wash the two shelves, the table ledge, the plank bed, the hot water pipe, and finally the concrete floor. This work, however, is light compared with the tin-ware cleaning. Chapel and exercise fill up the rest of the morning. At exercise we walk round and round the courtyard in single file, and all at equal distances. "Reverse," cries the wardress, and we walk round the other way. During this time we are not allowed to talk, but, needless to say, we drop a word occasionally, the strictness of prison rule relaxing as we get near the close of our stay.

From half-past 11 till 12 we are locked in our cells once more, and at midday hear the clanking of tin cans, as some third-class misdemeanants (we belong to the first division), led by the wardress, come round with a waggon load of dinner tins. These hold potatoes with pea stew, boiled beef, pork, and beans, according to the day, and always a roll of brown bread. Save for an excursion to the gallery tap to wash our mugs, afternoon and evening are eventless. We sit in our cells, read, knit, or contemplate our surroundings.

'Self Portrait in Prison Dress',
Sylvia Pankhurst 1907.
Physical Weariness.
What do we suffer from most? It is not till the second week that the monotony preys on our spirits, and for most of us, the food being wholesome, is agreeable enough. We suffer much from physical weariness. In chapel we sit on benches without backs, and, unlike the London cab horses, cannot lean upon one another. In the cells we have no heat but a stool, and we are not permitted to lay out our plank beds till after 6. These beds again are as hard as the concrete floor. We have excellent electric light, however, and our cells are well heated, too much so for my taste. In fact, I should really suffer if I did not get up on my stool occasionally and breathe into the ventilator. Every afternoon as the clock strikes 3 I take my little constitutional to that ventilator, while viewing as much of the scenery as I can through the closed window. Till March 31 our electric light is turned on from 6 till about half-past 8; but from April 1 no light is allowed. It is now the summer season, even though the dusk begins before 7, leaving us several hours of idle wakefulness in our comfortless cells. Very dreary were these hours, and we can quite realise that prisoners spend them in devising new means of wickedness.

Our chaplain has amused ns very much. He does not approve of the Suffragettes, and when a prisoner, asked her religion, pronounced herself a member of the Ethical Thought Society, answered abruptly, "Never heard of it." He has preached a sermon against us, counselling us to remember that a woman's best ornament is submission to authority. When he did this after a previous raid a suffragette was ill-advised enough to interrupt him. This, as a wardress explained to me, was very foolish, as it might have led the ordinary criminal women to revolt, and then "we should all for a time have been at their mercy.” We have the laugh at the chaplain, however, for did he not tell us of certain Biblical character that she was a "free agent,""as free as any of you, sisters!" At Easter time we have another chaplain, and he, quite accidentally, I believe, gives a stirring sermon on the necessity of fighting and striving, and disregarding the comments of the world. To which preacher shall we suffragists lend an ear?

Denuded as they are of ordinary furniture, our cells are amply stored with religious literature. Besides Bible, hymnbook, and prayer-book, I have a piece of cardboard with an evening and a morning hymn, and a book, "The Narrow Way," which tells me not to indulge in luxurious living. Besides these is a slate and slate pencil. When I apply for pen and paper, explaining that I am a journalist, the governor seems to think this slate should satisfy my requirements. However, I persuade him otherwise. It is very difficult to know what one may or may not have in gaol, as there are no definite rules except that mirrors, hair pads, and sharp instruments are peremptorily disallowed. The Women's Social and Political Union sends each of us a newspaper every day, and from these we learn what is happening in Holloway. I am allowed but two of the many visitors that apply to see me. It is curious that the first is forbidden to give me the rose she has brought, but the other is permitted to leave a book…

So the days pass on. The visiting magistrate, doctor, and governor come round occasionally, and on Wednesday we visit the baths, which are not quite so well kept as the rest of Holloway. Now, however, the day of freedom dawns. How early we wake, so pleased that we are hardly angry to find that our good clothes and hat have been wrapped in bundles, according to Holloway usage that they are not as neat as we would like them to be. Once again we are weighed, and receive back jewels, money, hair pads (if we wear them), and other accessories. As we march out we hear the band that has come to welcome us. Tickets are given us for the twopenny tube, another ticket for Eustace Miles's restaurant; arrived in London we form into procession again, and, guarded by our friends, the police (now our protectors) enter that well-known tearoom. Here we enjoy our first good breakfast, finding at each plate a bunch of narcissi, with Mr. and Mrs. Pethick Laurence's compliments. For others, as for myself, there are to be club dinners, reception teas, and other honours which, spite of certain unpleasantnesses of gaol life, we feel to be undeserved.Meanwhile give me an armchair!’ (The Mercury, 24 June 1907)

Remembering Old Queensland on Facebook

$
0
0
Just below this short article is a list of links to Facebook pages about the history of specific towns, cities and regions in Queensland.The kind of pages with the words ‘lost’ or ‘vintage’ or ‘remembering’ in their titles. The number of these pages seems to be growing all the time so I thought it would be handy to provide a 'one-stop shop'. 


These pages vary in size and activity, but together they form a useful jigsaw puzzle of Queensland's photographic history. Apart from bringing people together to think and talk about their memories and local history, they can be incredibly useful for researchers. I wrote an article on this a few years aback for the Professional Historian’s Association, pointing out that Facebook pages can contain a lot of anecdotal material and unpublished photos, and allow researchers to directly connect to people with information.

The experience of some archivists and librarians, however, has not been so positive. I know from personal experience that the advent of the ‘town memories’ pages was met with disdain in some places, with archivist staff (rightly) concerned by the uncontrolled and uncredited online distribution of material that their institutions owned the copyright on. I was working in a municipal council’s digital archive department when a new local history Facebook page started sharing their photos, and I witnessed the archivist’s determined attempts to clamp down on the practice. The admins on that page ended up imposing strict conditions on photo sharing there. 

At the same time I was regularly frequenting another Facebook page - for another place - which was having a similar experience with local librarians banning the online sharing of their local history photos.

In my opinion, many major libraries and archives have missed a trick here because these pages actually represent an opportunity to greatly expand their own collections and knowledge base. The true value of the Facebook pages is in (a) having people share old photos from private collections, and (b) people providing new background information for photos (such as names and dates).

I wrote to the relevant archivists about the second Facebook mentioned above, suggesting they implement a sharing scheme in which they make watermarked versions of their images available to share on Facebook, and in return they could harvest the comments for historical data. They might also get permission to access private collections of interesting photos. Unfortunately, I received no reply. In the subsequent years, many people on that page have shared brilliant photos from their family collections, giving new insights into life in the town in decades past. I feel that, for those archivists, it remains an opportunity missed due to professional snobbery.

"What is this 'Facebook' you speak of?"

Fortunately, more libraries seem to be embracing the potential of community engagement with their collections via social media these days.

Anyway, here is the list Queensland pages.I have attempted to locate as many examples of this type of page as I can, but I expect it is incomplete. The little blurbs come from the pages themselves. If you know of any pages that should be here, please let me know in the comments section below.

Please note: I am currently compiling a list of historical society pages separate to this. That article will appear soon.

  • Adavale Outback Queensland:History, Heritage, Stories, Pictures and Memories from the great Pioneering Outback Town of Adavale and district, Western Queensland.’
  • Brisbane Memories: ‘Brisbane, a place to live, visit and remember. Regardless of how long you have spent here in this fair city, there are memories that can be shared...’
  • Darling Downs of Yesteryear: ‘A blast from the past! Please place your old photos of the Darling Downs here for everyone to see what has changed and what is still the same!’
  • Disappearing Queensland: ‘This page is for anyone to share photos or stories of places in Queensland that are disappearing or could disappear at some time in the future.’
  • Gladstone: Remember When (Closed Group): ‘We all have enjoyed the reflection down memory lane and the current events. So, here is a page for the Gladstone region to your stories, photos, events, history of the region. Please create albums to add your photos, video’s too, share your school Tonkas, find your old school mates and teachers or maybe colleagues you have worked with. Please share your photos for all to enjoy and don’t forget to LIKE the page and SHARE away.’
  • Have You Seen the Old Gold Coast: ‘Lets see the old Gold Coast.... Do you have any old pics of The Coast ?’
  • Have You Seen the Old Mackay: Promoting the rich history of Mackay and District and preserving the history we have left so it is saved for future generations
  • Historical Gympie‘A place for historical information and photos of the Gympie Region.’
  • Lost Brisbane: ‘Photos of forgotten Brisbane. See if you can recognise the places in the photos, and tag them if you wish. Please feel free to add photos, make comments or relate any memories you might have about the places in the photos. Enjoy.....’
  • Lost Cairns: ‘Photographs of Cairns and district, Queensland - in times gone by.’
  • Lost Ipswich (Public Group): ‘This is a group for remembering what Ipswich has lost. Not to be negative but more to celebrate this towns Past in Stories and Pictures.’
  • Lost Logan: ‘Welcome to Lost Logan. Discover a bygone era of Logan. Everyone is welcome to tag photo's and post their own...enjoy!’
  • Lost Maryborough‘Photos of forgotten Maryborough (Queensland). See if you can recognise the places in the photos, and tag them if you wish. Please feel free to add photos, make comments or relate any memories you might have about the places in the photos. Enjoy’
  • Lost Queensland: ‘This page is for places, people and infrastructure no longer in existence or lost in the mists of time in Queensland. Please add anything you feel would be interesting to this page.’
  • Lost Sunshine Coast: ‘This group is for sharing, in any format, all the "lost" beings &characters, things, places, events, experiences, memories, memorabilia, & encounters with the Sunshine Coast of Queensland in our past.’
  • Lost Townsville: ‘A way for people to share images of Townsville in past times.’
  • Old Brisbane Album (Public Group):  ‘Old Brisbane Album is a sister group to Old NSW Album, Old Melbourne Album and Old Sydney Album. It is a group to share your memories of days gone by in Brisbane and surrounds, including the Gold Coast.’
  • Rockhampton: Remember When (Public Group): ‘…here is a page for the Rockhampton region to share your stories, photos, events, history of the region. Please create albums to add your photos, video’s too, share your school Tonkas, find your old school mates and teachers or maybe colleagues you have worked with. Please share your photos for all to enjoy and don’t forget to LIKE the page and SHARE away.’
  • Stanthorpe History: ‘This page has been created to share Stanthorpe History. Feel free to add your pictures, stories, memories and comments about Stanthorpe and its surrounds.’
  • Toowoomba: Remember When:‘Our mission: to help people experience the joy of recalling forgotten, but happy, memories of Toowoomba’s bygone eras.’
  • Vintage Queensland: ‘If you appreciate vintage photos (pre 1980) ......you will love Vintage Queensland! Feel free to comment and add your own photos if you wish.’
  • Vintage Rural Australia: ‘Post your own photos on Vintage Rural Australia: an album of LIFE ON THE FARM, in times past. Share, and save the memories and history with others.’
  • Warwick - Pictures From the Past: ‘The history of Warwick, Queensland, Australia... in pictures. Displaying photographs dating back to 1840.’



What's in Store For Brisbane City Council's Cemeteries in 2016?

$
0
0
I have recently been involved in discussions with Brisbane City Council cemetery management, and it looks like changes are afoot in how the public will be able to ‘engage’ with these places in 2016. Cemeteries are classed as ‘parks’ under council laws, and the BCC are now keen to open them up to a wider range of community use with such activities as picnics, band concerts, film screenings, tours, historical information boards, etc. 


Nothing is finalised yet, but these new activities will be regulated under a new permit system that allows different individuals and organisations to hold various cultural events in cemeteries, providing set conditions are met. There is a focus on attracting a variety of different people, and nobody has a ‘monopoly’.

Activities that raise no money, or only a ‘small’ amount, will be fee-free. All money raised will go into a ’communal’ Heritage Fund controlled by the BCC, from which funds will be granted for various cemetery heritage projects. This Fund would also include donations and bequests from members of the public.

Talks are also underway to improve cemetery funding. Considering that the BCC charges $5,735 for new graves in their historic cemeteries, I’d say they have an obligation to their customers to keep their ‘product’ up to scratch. I understand that works are already underway to fix internal roadways and bringing trees under control (I have written about the threat posed by cemetery trees before).

This new situation creates new opportunities, but also new threats.

The opportunities come with allowing people to offer new cultural activities in municipal cemeteries. As a historian, I hope to see other people stepping up with new ways of respectfully presenting cemetery history to the public. I emphasis the word respectfullyhere because this new system needs to be carefully monitored. BCC must never forget the primary function of their cemeteries as resting places for the deceased. They sell graves to paying customers with the clear understanding that the BCC will provide a safe and respected place for their loved ones. All other uses of cemeteries must be secondary to - and compatible with - that primary function.

The BCC has a mixed record on this issue. Before 2010, it seemed they had little idea of what was going on in their cemeteries at night. Commercial operators were exploiting the cemeteries for a whole range of for-profit activities, including ghost tours, ghost hunts, and various ‘party’ events. Customers were being charged big money, but the operators didn’t pay a single cent for using these ratepayer-funded facilities. They didn’t even have permission for some of these activities.

This situation ended after the ‘Friends of South Brisbane Cemetery’ proposed not-for-profit night-time fundraising tours, drawing a hostile response from the private tour operator. The subsequent hullabaloo forced the BCC to step in and reassert control over their cemeteries. They banned ghost hunts, and introduced a tour license system that made tour operators actually pay for the privilege of exploiting cemeteries. Tour content and marketing was also regulated to wind back any disrespectful schlock-horror themes, although there is strong evidence that a tour operator was still performing supposedly-banned ‘pseudo-occult rituals’ during cemetery tours in 2015.  

Hopefully the new system will be another step forward, but it is absolutely crucial that the BCC set clear parameters for what is - and what is not - allowed in their cemeteries. The primary concern must always be to respect the memory and the families of the deceased people interred in BCC cemeteries.

Cemeteries don’t exist for the benefit of historians, musicians, actors and cinema-goers. They exist for the benefit of those people dealing with the death of loved ones. I’m all for imbuing that space with some positive, creative energy, much like I have recently written about for Boggo Road Gaol, but BCC will need to take their caretaking role seriously.

I'm currently speaking with other people about issues with the proposed uses of Brisbane cemeteries in 2016, but what kind of parameters would I personally like to see the BCC put in place?

First of all, a commitment to historical accuracy is vital. I’m not talking about honest mistakes - we all occasionally make technical mistakes with historical data - but I’m more concerned here about outright invention and twisting of facts just to create a more 'interesting' story. I’d like to see the BCC take on a role in which they pre-approve historical content presented in their cemeteries, under their permit system, to ensure it is appropriate and respectful. After all, protecting the heritage of cemeteries does include ensuring that their history is correctly told. Myself and other writers have dealt with the issue of dodgy cemetery history on several occasions before, and I for one will continue to do so if the situation is not rectified.

Secondly, there needs to be a crackdown on people in the 'paranormal industry' promoting municipal cemeteries as hotspots of ghostly activity. This has a negative impact on how cemeteries are perceived. Sure, the places have an association with death, but that is a serious, functional and personal association, and not a funtime haunted house for zombie walks, horror movies, fancy dress parties and role-playing ghost-hunters. We saw the devastating vandalism of 82 graves at Toowong Cemetery in 2009 linked to 'Satanic wannabees', and promoting our cemeteries as paranormal playgrounds does nothing to deter such idiots. Let our dead rest in peace, and stop profiteers from pretending that they aren't. Again, this all comes back to ensuring that people who buy grave plots from the BCC get what they are paying for.

The Friends of South Brisbane Cemetery (of which I am a convenor) have already heard from a few people with ideas for cemetery events in 2016. We are willing to act as community advisers for anybody with project ideas, and also to advise on logistical issues such as insurance, etc. The FOSBCcan be contacted atfosbc@outlook.com or private messaged on their Facebook page.

Fatal Shark Attacks in Mackay Rivers

$
0
0
I've already written in these pages about fatal shark attacks in Queensland rivers, including the Brisbane River, the Logan River and Townsville's Ross Creek. Another one to add to that unfortunate list is the Pioneer River, which runs through the central coast city of Mackay.

The first recorded attack came in December 1939 at Rubbish Dump Creek. This was about 30 metres wide and a popular swimming spot for the locals. It was so named because of a nearby dump, the refuse from which was also thought to attract sharks. One hot day, around noon, 20-year-old railway fireman Frank Gurran was fishing in the creek when he decided to have a quick dip in the water, which was about 3 metres deep. He dived off the rowing boat he was in, but as soon as he resurfaced he cried out 'shark!'. Onlookers thought it might have been a prank, but they sprinted for help when the water turned red. 

A bull shark almost 3 metres long had gripped Curran's right leg. He kicked furiously at it until it let go, but it returned and bit into his left foot. Curran managed to scramble to the shore, where a companion helped him. While lying waiting for the ambulance, he directed the application of ligatures to stem the bleeding in his leg, smoked a cigarette, and joked about finally getting time off work for Christmas. Curran was soon rushed to the local hospital, where it was found necessary to amputate his right leg below the knee. He received massive blood transfusions that kept him alive for a while, but he died three days after sustaining his injuries.

The shark that bit him was caught and killed within hours of the attack. Charles Simpson, who boarded with Gurran, baited a hook and line with a bullock's liver after seeing the shark 'lazily cruising up and down the stream'. The shark took the bait and Simpson coaxed it to the bank, where he bludgeoned it with an axe. The shark was landed after another boy put 14 air-rifle pellets into its head. It was reportedly still 'quivering' when the following Mercury picture of the shark and its captors was taken:
 
(Daily Mercury, 18 December 1939).
(Daily Mercury, 18 December 1939).

In later years the Dump Creek area became the site of the Caneland Central shopping complex.
 
The next fatal river shark attack at Mackay took place in February 1956. Barry Antonini, aged 15 years, was swimming with friends in the Rocklea reach of the Pioneer River one morning. The boys were diving from the bank into deep water and returning to shore. Antonini dived in, resurfaced about 3 metres from the bank, and scrambled back. When a friend pulled him out they saw that Antonini had been bitten deeply on the calf of the right leg and part of the muscle was removed. He was bleeding profusely.

The boys ran to get help from a policeman who was fishing nearby. A tourniquet was applied to the leg and the ambulance arrived, Antonini turned to his friends and said, 'It looks as though I will have to have my leg taken off.' Sadly, he died on the way to hospital. 

'Sailing on the Pioneer River, Mackay', c.1935 (State Library of Qld)
'Sailing on the Pioneer River, Mackay', c.1935 (State Library of Qld)

There have been no more fatal attacks in the rivers or creeks of Mackay since that time.

Old Queensland Prisons #16: Mackay Prison (1883-1935)

$
0
0
The timeline of the HM Prison, Mackay, is slightly more complicated than most, and there has been some confusion over the lifespan of that prison. Two prominent online articles date it at as operating between 1888-1908 (see here and here), but parliamentary records show that a prison was proclaimed in Mackay as early as 1883, and that it closed in 1935. The confusion seems to stem from the changing use of two different Mackay buildings for the prison.
 
Victoria Street, Mackay, c.1907.
Mackay is a north/central coast city that was first populated by Europeans in the 1860s. It soon became the ‘sugar capital’ of Queensland, and the plantations in the general area extensively exploited South Sea Islander labour. This industry drove the rapid development of the district, which of course necessitated a law and order presence.
A prison was officially proclaimed for Mackay on 18 July 1883. This was based in a small building that had been built as a two-cell police lock-up in the late 1860s, on the corner of Victoria and Brisbane Streets in the centre of town. According to annual prison reports, the prison authorities seem to have still classed it as a police gaol after 1883, meaning it was staffed by police and not prison officers, and used it primarily to house prisoners for a short while before transferring them to larger facilities elsewhere, such as Rockhampton or Townsville.  
In the 1880s this prison was surrounded by a 3-metre-high stockade fence and consisted of a ward to hold ten inmates, a cell for another four, and two more cells large enough to take two prisoners each (although safety rules stipulated that cells could only hold one or three persons). In reality it was cramped and usually overcrowded. In his annual report for prisons in 1885, the Sheriff of Queensland wrote that:
‘Two of the cells are required for drunks and lunatics, one for female prisoners, leaving only one cell for other prisoners. Kanakas, Cingalese, Javanese, and other coloured races, and European prisoners have to be confined in the same cells, which is highly objectionable, and leads to constant quarrels among the prisoners.’
A scathing article in the Mackay Mercury in 1886 described the prison as ‘a disgrace to the district and the whole colony’.  
Although a number of improvements were made to the original prison during the 1880s, a new five-cell prison was built in 1888 on the north side of Mackay, around Goldston, Basset and Vine Streets, and the prisoners from the old lock-up were sent to this new facility. It had single cells for 16 inmates, and a ward for another 12.
This new building was proclaimed to be a prison on 20 February 1889, and was ready to be used during the following month. The proclamation for the former prison was rescinded on 20 march 1889. The new prison was described in a newspaper article:
‘The residence provided by the country for criminals, which was recently opened on the North Side, is now in full working order, late Senior-constable Schneider being gaoler, and having under him two turnkeys. There are at present confined in the gaol 18 prisoners, 17 males and 1 female, who are treated on what is known as the silent or separate system, all communication between them being strictly prohibited. The gaol, which would accommodate on a pinch double the number of prisoners, is thoroughly well ventilated, and provided with suitable yards, outbuildings, hospital, and reception wards; The two latter are particularly well fitted up, and point the moral that a sick or mad prisoner is a great deal better off than a healthy one. In fact Gaoler Schneider says the number of his birds that assure him they are sick shows that the benefits of the hospital are thoroughly appreciated. Everything is as clean as water, soap, and brushes will make it, and the place reflects credit on the muscular energy of the prisoners as well as upon the careful supervision of those who run the show. Outside the gaol, draining, clearing, etc., is going on, supplying the prisoners with hard labor and at the same time greatly improving the precincts of the gaol. Further alterations, such as enlargening the exercise yards, heightening the palisades, and building a watch-tower, are required. When these additions have been made the establishment will compare favorably with any in the colony as far as its completeness is concerned.’ (Mackay Mercury, 25 July 1889)
The northside gaol reserve, Mackay.

A government proclamation on 22 January 1891 that the Mackay police gaol was now a prison (while they simultaneously announced the closure of the police gaol) creates some confusion about the status of prisons in the town at this time. These announcements could have been technical requirements as the new Prisons Act 1890 had come into force just a few weeks earlier.
Despite the earlier praise from the Mackay Mercury, the Sheriff of Queensland noted in his 1892 prisons report that the ‘Mackay Gaol buildings are in good repair... but are ill adapted to the requirements of a prison’. Pending further research, I am unsure why he felt this way, but in September 1893 the new prison on the north side was officially closed and the old one on Victoria/Brisbane streets was reopened. This downsizing might have been the result of the opening of a large new prison in Townsville, but the Mackay municipal council passed a resolution opposing the switch, and expressed concern about reverting to the use of the old lock-up which was ‘centrally located in the best part of town’. It was noted in the annual prisons report for 1893 that the new prison had been closed, with ‘short-sentence prisoners being detained at the old original gaol attached to the lock-up... which has been proclaimed a prison’. Inmate capacity in Mackay dipped back down to 16, and long-term inmates were sent to Townsville.
It is probably worth mentioning (just to confirm that it had closed) that the former prison on the northside was temporarily used to quarantine people suspected of contamination during a plague scare in 1900.
The original Mackay prison on Brisbane/Victoria streets (State Library of Queensland).
HM Prison Mackay operated until 31 October 1935, when it was one of only eight prisons in Queensland. It was gradually improved and expanded over the years. When it closed, all the Mackay prisoners were removed to HM Prison, Rockhampton.

So there had been a prison in Mackay since July 1883, although it is arguable that that first facility was technically a police gaol. There definitely was a new prison proclaimed in 1889, although that one only lasted for a few years before the authorities reverted back to using the original prison in 1893. Then, despite the stories that it closed in 1908, the prison remained open until the 1930s.

Scenes by the 1840s Brisbane River

$
0
0
The following vivid description of life by the Brisbane River in the 1840s was written by William Clark in 1917. Clark arrived at Moreton Bay in 1849 with his parents when he was 12 years old.

In his early years he assisted his father in felling pine timber and splitting shingles in the dense scrubland of the Boggo district, from the present Fairfield to Oxley Creek. From the 1860s he was occupied in various industries around Queensland, including sheep, cattle and mining. In his later years he wrote regular articles for the Brisbane Courier and the Queenslanderreminiscing about his early life and adventures:

THE BRISBANE RIVER. SEVENTY YEARS AGO (Queenslander, 26 May 1917)


‘Further upstream from the creek, after which Creek-street is named, near the bamboos in the Botanic Gardens, stood a cottage, painted green, with a fine orchard attached. This was the residence of an old-time military officer. Opposite on the south bank stood primitive Kangaroo Point, with a few scattered houses. At the end of the Point was John Rankin's pineapple garden, with John - or, as he was called, Tinker - Campbell's boiling down works, the first in Moreton Bay. In 1848 the Point was the scene of a tragic murder, for which a cook at Sutton's Hotel named Fife was executed. The affair was the outcome of a drunken melee, in which the boiling down butchers were said to have been implicated, as the testimony of a friend of the writer's, who was actually an eye witness of the disposal of part of the body fully corroborates. The upset price of the Kangaroo Point land at the local sale in 1843 was £1 per acre. Just above the present Dry Dock, on the bank of the river, was John Slack's paddock. John Slack afterwards formed a cattle station on Slack's Creek, Logan River. Walmsley Point, on the opposite bank, in the old Domain, was named after John Walmsley, who had a sawpit there. 


Early panoramic view of Brisbane, 1862 (John Oxley Library)

Following the river bank upwards, the Commissary buildings (now Colonial Stores) was reached, built in 1829, as the date stone of the building indicates, although Mr. Neimiah Bartley, in his book ‘Agates and Opals,’ gives the date as 1822, in a chapter headed ‘Brisbane in 1822,’ when, in fact, Brisbane was ‘non-et-iventus.’ The old place, with the rubble stone wall nearby, is one of the few remaining relics of penal times. Visitors to the old building may now see in the floors the old-fashioned wrought iron nails of the period. On the opposite bank was primitive South Brisbane. Tom Archer tells us that when he arrived there in 1841 with his wool teams from Durundur, by way of Kilcoy and Cressbrook stations, via Ipswich, not a single house or habitation then existed in the place. The Stanley-street frontage 70 years ago was occupied by Messrs. Orr Bros., butchers - James and William. It is now Baynes Bros., also butchers. Daniel Peterson's wharf and store was next. In the store big Dick Allcock, his father, and George, his brother, printed and published the first issue of the Moreton Bay ‘Free Press,’ that afterwards merged into the ‘Guardian’ newspaper. Adjoining was John M'Cabe's Freemasons' Hotel and wharf, afterwards Christie's. Peter Gablen's residence and wharf followed. Then came the old Hunter River Steam Co.'s premises, with two large receiving stores. One of the old gate posts is still standing in Stanley-street. The managers of the company in succession were William Connoley, George Salt Tucker, and Henry Buckley, our first Auditor-General. 

Adjoining the old Russell-street ferry was Sandy MacIntyre's property, on which the company's steamers made fast their head lines to a tree. The company wished to purchase the property, and made an offer, which was not accepted. One morning the head lines were cut. The steamer's head lay down stream. The company then said good-bye to SouthBrisbane. So we lost the steamers. The earliest of those steamers was known as The William, the fourth colonial built boat. Afterwards came the Eagle, Captain Allen, Sovereign, Captain Cape, and the Tamar, Captain Murphy. The ferry approaches of old Russell- Street were by a cutting through a high grassy bank. For some distance above the ferry, the riverbank was occupied by sawpits. Adjoining the sawpits were two cottage residences, one the early home of the M'Naught family, the other the residence of Mr William Wilkes, editor of the ‘Moreton Bay Courier.’ The land on which they stood now forms the approaches to Victoria Bridge.


Moreton Bay Settlement from South Brisbane, c.1835, sketch attributed to
Henry W. Boucher Bowerman (John Oxley Library)

At North Quay, on the present ice works, stood M'Cormack the builder's cottage. In a right angle line near the present alignment of George-street was ‘God's acre’ - the convict burial ground; where many of the victims of the relentlessly cruel penal administration slept their last sleep. The spot was not reserved in early surveys. The graves had fallen in below the surface when the writer last visited it. There were no head marks to the graves. Recently, when a building foundation was put in, some human remains were dug up, when I informed the Lands Department of the exact locale of the old cemetery. On the river bank above M'Cormack's was the military burial ground, where an officer was buried in a bricked-in vault, with a solid stone block, oblong in shape on top of the ground, with an inscription. A few steps led down to the entrance door, painted blue. On the south bank the next point of interest was the site of the present municipal baths, known as the Sandy Beach, where boats were beached for repairs. It was a favourite place with the blacks for swimming the river

Round the point was the residence of Corporal M'Cann, an officer of penal times. Adjoining was the market garden of James Kirkwood, who  wheeled his vegetables round South Brisbane in a barrow. Then came, at present site of SouthBrisbane Cricket Ground, Pendergrast's farm. The place was fenced in, a slab hut and small milking yard erected, and in 1848 abandoned by the owner, who never returned. Both banks of the river were without habitation until Oven's Head was reached, where a convict gang, who was cutting long saplings murdered their ganger, throwing his head into Clark's Creek, close by, and his body into the river. The spot is now enclosed in the SouthBrisbaneCemetery. The surrounding scrubs were full of pine trees. There the writer, when a lad of thirteen years, began work with his father splitting laths and shingles for old Andrew Petrie. 

At Fairfield was the farm of Samuel Scarlet Bailey. The place had previously been fixed on for a sugar plantation by the Brisbane Sugar Company, a proposition that never eventuated, owing to the dictum of a St. Domingo planter, who considered the degree of frost against the growth of sugar in Moreton Bay. This was the first move in sugar growing. Further up towards Canoe or Oxley Creek, was the Government freestone quarry, with a ‘floor’ put in at the river level, whence stone was punted to the settlement. The north bank was still without settlement until Moggil Creek was reached, where the bulk of the Lima's immigrants settled to farm in 1849; and where John - or, as he was commonly called, ‘Butte’ - Williams opened, about 1846, the Moggil coal pits. On the head of the creek was an ancient sheep station, owned by Jack and Darby M'Grath. No more settlement on that bank for a long distance past the confluence of the Bremer. 

On the south bank, at Wolston, now Goodna, was the home of Dr. Stephen Simpson, a Crown Lands Commissioner. It was here that the escapee Bracefield, brought in by Petrie in 1842, met his death while felling scrub. Redbank was the site of the Government dairy, where a large stockyard stood on the edge of Redbank Swamp. The river then was without settlement until John Uhr's Wivenhoe station was reached, the Cressbrook frontage, Colinton station following. Then the river bed became a precipitous mountain stream, boulder strewn to its source in the Bunya Mountains at Simon Scott's Toromeo station. With the establishment of steam traffic by the Hunter River Steam Co., the necessity for utilising the waterway of the river for conveyance of wool and stores between Brisbane and Ipswich became urgent. The steamers to Sydney plied monthly. Wool teams often got to town a day or so after the steamer had left. They then camped until she returned. The camping place was at the old Wheat Sheaf Inn, which stood at the edge of a large swamp near the site of Brigg's drapery store, in Melbourne street, SouthBrisbane. Messrs. James Reid and Thomas Boyland met the difficulty by contracting to build the necessary receiving stores for the steam company. They then built a large punt, and took delivery of wool from Darling Downs and the Upper Brisbane at Ipswich from the teams. The huge Noah's ark was moved down slowly on the tide way by long sweeps to South Brisbane. 

Steamers soon began to ply on the up-river waters. The first, the Experiment, was brought from Sydney by James Canning Pearce. She soon came to grief by being short tied at a Brisbane wharf. In the night the tide rose over her. The steward, who was sleeping on board, awoke to find the water pouring down below, and rushed on deck. It was supposed his money was below; he made a fatal rush down the ladder, and was engulfed in the flood waters pouring down the stairway. Messrs. Reid and Boyland bought the old wreck, took her boilers and engines out, and put them into a steamer they built on a slip on Montague-road frontage named the Hawk. I remember when she was towed by a boat to SouthBrisbane. The men on her called to people on the river bank ‘The Hawk is coming; look out for your chickens.’ Meanwhile Mr. Thomas Coutts had  arrived with the steamer Raven from Sydney. She was too large for the trade. The scrub trees overhung the narrow river. The old skipper would come on deck from below and shout to the man at the wheel, ‘Helm a lee! Keep her head out of the bush.’ 

Steamers on the Brisbane River, 1855 (Conrad Martens)

Sometime afterward a still larger steamer was placed on the river, named the Bredalbane, by Messrs. Robert Towns and Co., in connection with their South Brisbane business. Although a Sydney merchant, be was truly a pioneer of Queensland, being the first chairman of the Hunter River Steam Co. He subsequently embarked in cotton growing at Towns Vale, on the Logan. He was practically  the founder of Townsville. He financed the development of the Redbank Collieries, and in conjunction with Mr. John Graham M'Donald, he explored and pioneered Burketown and the Gulf country. Meanwhile Mr. James Reid, the veteran river man, was a squatter at Camboon, on the Lower Dawson, with Towns and Co. as his station agents. Mr. Reid, when visiting Sydney, promised Mr. Towns that he would take the wheel of the Bredalbane on her trial trip. The steamer grounded for the night at the Seventeen-Mile Rocks. From the dense scrubs on the bank the mosquitoes came down on their prey. The party retreated below, when for the first and last time in his life, so it was said, Bobbie Towns sung a song, his subject being ‘That dark girl dressed in blue.’ A journalist on board sought the deck for fresh air, and sat down on a dry cask. The head fell in, and when discovered ‘Theo’ was quite comfortable, his legs hanging over the edge of the cask. The Bredalbane was subsequently returned to Sydney, being too large for the trade. Eventually the Swallow and other steamers were built, drawing less water. 

The advent of the railway from Brisbane to Ipswich caused a considerable decrease in river traffic. The pioneers of the BrisbaneRiver and its traffic, or settlement on the banks, were men of firm  and steady step, men of indomitable energy, worthy to rank with Fenimore Cooper's ‘Pathfinders,’ whose memory their few remaining compeers still hold in kindly remembrance.’



Old Queensland Prisons #17: Blackall Prison (1891-1902)

$
0
0
The introduction of the Prisons Act 1890 in Queensland led to a shake-up of the prison system here, with attention paid to the official classification of police gaols and 'real' prisons. One gaol to be upgraded was at Blackall, a small Queensland town lying some 500 km south-west of Rockhampton. European pastoralists had arrived there during the 1860s and a village was in place by 1867. This was named Blackall and it later became the administrative centre for the local district.
 
Shamrock Street, Blackall, ca. 1885 (John Oxley Library)

By the late 1870s the town had seven hotels, seven stores, a school, and a growing need for a local gaol. Carceral facilities were vital for regional areas, given the high cost of otherwise transporting prisoners over great distances to prisons in cities so they could face trial. A meeting of the Blackall Progress Association in 1879 noted this when it called for the erection of a local gaol. They cited the recent case of a Chinese prisoner who was committed to take his trial at the Blackall District Court, but had to be sent to Rockhampton and brought back again at a cost of £60. An 1880 article in the Brisbane Week also crunched the numbers to argue the case for a gaol at Blackall.   

The logic was clear, and a police gaol was established at Blackall circa 1881. This facility was described in an 1887 report as having two divisions, one with six cells to hold up to ten male prisoners, and the other with three cells for three female prisoners. Conditions there were described as 'deplorable'. Escapes were not uncommon, and in 1890 a reporter wrote that 'it really gets monotonous chronicling escapes from this gaol', and he blamed the 'dilapidated state of the building'. 

The police gaol building was proclaimed to be HM Prison Blackall in November 1891. It remained a small timber prison used mainly for the incarceration of up to nine prisoners serving short sentences. A local police officer acted as superintendent, with the aid of a temporary warder if prisoner numbers exceeded ten. Inmates held there were employed cutting wood and carrying out repairs on government fences or police horse harnesses.

The prison remained open for a decade, during which time there was still the occasional escape, including this one.  

HM Prison Blackall closed on 15 August 1902 as the Queensland government sought to rein in spending, and it immediately reverted back to the status of a police gaol. All prisoners serving sentences longer than 30 days were transferred to Rockhampton. The police gaol was eventually closed in 1922. 
After being in existence for about a half century the Blackall gaol has been closed in pursuance of the "deflating" policy of the Government. In the old days the gaol was used for prisoners as far away as Birds ville, Betoota, Bedourie, and other places in the "Never-Never," and even from Winton. Among the distinguished unpaid guests was "The "Wild Scotchman," whose correct name was Macpherson. (Western Champion, 15 July 1922)


Viewing all 246 articles
Browse latest View live